Filling gaps in PM2.5 time series: A broad evaluation from statistical to advanced neural network models

This study addressed the critical challenge of filling gaps in PM2.5 time series data from Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. We developed and evaluated a comprehensive hierarchy of 46 gap-filling methods across five representative gap lengths (5-72 hours), introducing dynamic models capable of adapting to gaps of variable duration. Tree-based models with bidirectional sequence-to-sequence architectures delivered superior performance, with XGB Seq2Seq achieving a mean absolute error of 5.231 ± 0.292 μg/m3 for 12-hour gaps, representing a 63% improvement over basic statistical methods. The advantage of multivariate models incorporating meteorological variables increased substantially with gap length, from modest improvements of 2-3% for 5-hour gaps to significant enhancements of 16-18% for 48-72 hour gaps. Dynamic multivariate models demonstrated remarkable operational flexibility by successfully processing real-world gaps ranging from 1 to 191 hours despite being trained on maximum lengths of 72 hours. Analysis of the reconstructed complete time series revealed that 61.2% of monitored hours exceeded the WHO daily threshold of 15 μg/m3, with strong seasonal patterns and pronounced diurnal cycles. This research advances environmental monitoring capabilities by providing robust methodological tools for addressing data continuity challenges that currently limit the utility of PM2.5 measurements for public health applications and scientific analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330211
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Filling gaps in PM2.5 time series: A broad evaluation from statistical to advanced neural network models

Ruslan Kamatov, Eldar Kopishev, Zhanat Shomanova, Ruslan Zairovich Safarov et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.80
article

Filling gaps in PM2.5 time series: A broad evaluation from statistical to advanced neural network models

Ruslan Kamatov, Eldar Kopishev, Zhanat Shomanova, Ruslan Zairovich Safarov, Yuriy Nossenko, Zhuldyz Bexeitova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study addressed the critical challenge of filling gaps in PM2.5 time series data from Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. We developed and evaluated a comprehensive hierarchy of 46 gap-filling methods across five representative gap lengths (5-72 hours), introducing dynamic models capable of adapting to gaps of variable duration. Tree-based models with bidirectional sequence-to-sequence architectures delivered superior performance, with XGB Seq2Seq achieving a mean absolute error of 5.231 ± 0.292 μg/m3 for 12-hour gaps, representing a 63% improvement over basic statistical methods. The advantage of multivariate models incorporating meteorological variables increased substantially with gap length, from modest improvements of 2-3% for 5-hour gaps to significant enhancements of 16-18% for 48-72 hour gaps. Dynamic multivariate models demonstrated remarkable operational flexibility by successfully processing real-world gaps ranging from 1 to 191 hours despite being trained on maximum lengths of 72 hours. Analysis of the reconstructed complete time series revealed that 61.2% of monitored hours exceeded the WHO daily threshold of 15 μg/m3, with strong seasonal patterns and pronounced diurnal cycles. This research advances environmental monitoring capabilities by providing robust methodological tools for addressing data continuity challenges that currently limit the utility of PM2.5 measurements for public health applications and scientific analysis.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University (KZ), Toraighyrov University (KZ), Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals (IN), Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.