On the practical applicability of DM21 neural-network DFT functional for chemical calculations: Focus on geometry optimization

Density functional theory is the workhorse of present-day quantum chemistry thanks to its good balance between calculation accuracy and speed. In recent years, several neural network-based exchange-correlation functionals have been developed, with DM21, developed by Google DeepMind, being the most recognizable among them. In this study, we focus on evaluating the efficiency of DM21 functional on the task of optimizing molecular geometries and investigate how the non-smooth behavior of neural network-predicted exchange-correlation energy and potential affects the final geometry precision. We implement geometry optimization for the DM21 functional in PySCF and compare its performance with traditional functionals on various benchmarks. Our findings reveal that numerical noise coming from the neural network outputs contaminates numerical nuclear gradients required for geometry optimization. We also found that a numerical differentiation step in the range of 0.0001-0.001 Å is required to obtain sufficiently smooth nuclear gradients. Furthermore, we show that the non-smoothness of DM21 can be reproduced by adding random normally distributed noise to local energies of an analytical SCAN functional, allowing one to efficiently estimate the optimal numerical differentiation step for geometry optimization of a given molecule. Our findings show that DM21 does not outperform analytical functionals in the accuracy of optimized molecular geometries and is significantly slower, which limits its practical applicability to chemical calculations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0266500
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the practical applicability of DM21 neural-network DFT functional for chemical calculations: Focus on geometry optimization

Michael G. Medvedev, Alexander Ryabov, Vladimir Vanovskiy, Evgeny Burnaev et al.
3 citations
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.55
article

On the practical applicability of DM21 neural-network DFT functional for chemical calculations: Focus on geometry optimization

Michael G. Medvedev, Alexander Ryabov, Vladimir Vanovskiy, Evgeny Burnaev, Kirill Kulaev
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Density functional theory is the workhorse of present-day quantum chemistry thanks to its good balance between calculation accuracy and speed. In recent years, several neural network-based exchange-correlation functionals have been developed, with DM21, developed by Google DeepMind, being the most recognizable among them. In this study, we focus on evaluating the efficiency of DM21 functional on the task of optimizing molecular geometries and investigate how the non-smooth behavior of neural network-predicted exchange-correlation energy and potential affects the final geometry precision. We implement geometry optimization for the DM21 functional in PySCF and compare its performance with traditional functionals on various benchmarks. Our findings reveal that numerical noise coming from the neural network outputs contaminates numerical nuclear gradients required for geometry optimization. We also found that a numerical differentiation step in the range of 0.0001-0.001 Å is required to obtain sufficiently smooth nuclear gradients. Furthermore, we show that the non-smoothness of DM21 can be reproduced by adding random normally distributed noise to local energies of an analytical SCAN functional, allowing one to efficiently estimate the optimal numerical differentiation step for geometry optimization of a given molecule. Our findings show that DM21 does not outperform analytical functionals in the accuracy of optimized molecular geometries and is significantly slower, which limits its practical applicability to chemical calculations.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsVol. 163(7)
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU), N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry (RU), Inception Institute of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.