Cardiovascular, kidney related, and weight loss effects of therapeutics for type 2 diabetes: a living clinical practice guideline

An international panel including two patient partners, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations. The panel followed standards for trustworthy guidelines and used the GRADE approach, explicitly considering the balance of benefits, harms and burdens of treatment from an individual patient perspective. Recommendations were informed by a linked living systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluating relative benefits and harms updated to 31 July 2024; and by linked systematic reviews addressing risk prediction models and values and preferences of adults with type 2 diabetes. Candidate therapeutics are prioritised based on availability of sufficient randomised trial data, relevance to a global audience and likelihood of changing practice.This is the first version of the living guideline. The guideline is part of the <i>BMJ Rapid Recommendations</i> series. MAGICapp displays the most recent version of the guideline and full content including evidence summaries and decision aids; major updates will be published in <i>The BMJ</i>. We encourage re-use, adaptation and translation of these living guidelines, and recognise that the lack of availability or high costs of some medications may be prohibitive and will impact on how these recommendations are implemented across different health care systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-082071
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiovascular, kidney related, and weight loss effects of therapeutics for type 2 diabetes: a living clinical practice guideline

Thomas Agoritsas, Per Olav Vandvik, Arnav Agarwal, Mieke Vermandere et al.
12 citations
BMJ
Diabetes Treatment and Management
15.54
article

Cardiovascular, kidney related, and weight loss effects of therapeutics for type 2 diabetes: a living clinical practice guideline

Thomas Agoritsas, Per Olav Vandvik, Arnav Agarwal, Mieke Vermandere, Veena Manja, Evi Nagler, Gordon Guyatt, René Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, Vivekanand Jha, Daniel Rayner, Adrienne Odom, Farid Foroutan, Reem A. Mustafa, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Robin Wright, Helen MacDonald, Jenan Gabi, Anja Fog Heen, Lixin Guo, Sheyu Li, Qiukui Hao, Sahana Shetty, Nicolas Rodondi, Britta Tendel Jeppesen
article en
12 citations

Abstract

An international panel including two patient partners, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations. The panel followed standards for trustworthy guidelines and used the GRADE approach, explicitly considering the balance of benefits, harms and burdens of treatment from an individual patient perspective. Recommendations were informed by a linked living systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluating relative benefits and harms updated to 31 July 2024; and by linked systematic reviews addressing risk prediction models and values and preferences of adults with type 2 diabetes. Candidate therapeutics are prioritised based on availability of sufficient randomised trial data, relevance to a global audience and likelihood of changing practice.This is the first version of the living guideline. The guideline is part of the <i>BMJ Rapid Recommendations</i> series. MAGICapp displays the most recent version of the guideline and full content including evidence summaries and decision aids; major updates will be published in <i>The BMJ</i>. We encourage re-use, adaptation and translation of these living guidelines, and recognise that the lack of availability or high costs of some medications may be prohibitive and will impact on how these recommendations are implemented across different health care systems.

BMJVol. 390
University of Geneva (CH), University of Bern (CH), University of Alberta (CA), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX), An-Najah National University (PS), University of Oslo (NO), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Sichuan University (CN), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Ghent University Hospital (BE), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research (CA), Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez (MX), Hypertension Institute (US), Pour la Solidarité (BE), George Institute for Global Health (IN), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Impact (CA), Imperial College London (GB), British Medical Association (GB), University of California, Davis (US), National Patient Safety Foundation (US), Sirris (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
15.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.