High-volume hospitals do not perform better than low-volume hospitals in septic and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of re-revision risk and mortality based on the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
There was no difference between high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals regarding risk for re-revision after aseptic loosening, dislocation and periprosthetic fracture, and septic DAIR and mortality. In high-volume hospitals, 1-stage septic revisions was associated with a significantly higher re-revision risk. 2-stage revisions are more frequent in high-volume hospitals, indicating more complex pathology.
Authors
- Bart Van Dooren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-1281)
- Liza N. van Steenbergen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8141-842X)
- B Willem Schreurs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-431X)
- Wierd P Zijlstra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-3824)
- Rinne M Peters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1484-4226)
- Amir Deen
- Markus P.M. Vink
Institutions
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL)
- Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Netherlands Heart Registration (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Acta Orthopaedica
- Published
- 2025-08-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44331
- Primary Topic
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00