Towards precision dosing of vancomycin in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a comparison of published population pharmacokinetic models

Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) often receive vancomycin as antibiotic treatment using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM can be performed using a Bayesian approach, where concentration measurements are supported by a previously developed pharmacokinetic model based on a population as similar as possible to the treated patient. As a model developed in a similar population is not always available, it must be ensured that the predictive performance is not compromised. We retrospectively collected data from 121 adult allo-HSCT patients who received vancomycin treatment including trough concentration TDM between January and December 2021. Predictive performance of 21 published pharmacokinetic models was assessed by comparing the third observed vancomycin concentration per patient with the corresponding model prediction. Prediction was based on covariates alone (<i>a priori</i>) or covariates and TDM measurements (Bayesian). Predictive performance was quantified by a median prediction error (MPE) for accuracy and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) for precision. MPE ranged between -199.6% and 93.3% (<i>a priori</i>) and between -50.6% and 19.1% (Bayesian), while MAPE ranged between 31.6% and 199.6% (<i>a priori</i>) and between 19.8% and 53.5% (Bayesian). The Okada et al. model was one of the most accurate and precise models in the <i>a priori</i> (MPE: -4%; MAPE: 31.6%) and Bayesian scenario (MPE: -6.9%; MAPE: 19.8%). The model published by Okada et al. was developed in allo-HSCT patients. That may explain the high predictive performance, especially in the <i>a priori</i> scenario. We recommend the Okada et al. model for future TDM in allo-HSCT patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00257-25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards precision dosing of vancomycin in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a comparison of published population pharmacokinetic models

Nicolaus Martin Kröger, E. William Behrens, Claudia Langebrake, Sebastian G. Wicha et al.
1 citations
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
1.39
article

Towards precision dosing of vancomycin in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a comparison of published population pharmacokinetic models

Nicolaus Martin Kröger, E. William Behrens, Claudia Langebrake, Sebastian G. Wicha, Eva-Maria Wansing
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) often receive vancomycin as antibiotic treatment using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM can be performed using a Bayesian approach, where concentration measurements are supported by a previously developed pharmacokinetic model based on a population as similar as possible to the treated patient. As a model developed in a similar population is not always available, it must be ensured that the predictive performance is not compromised. We retrospectively collected data from 121 adult allo-HSCT patients who received vancomycin treatment including trough concentration TDM between January and December 2021. Predictive performance of 21 published pharmacokinetic models was assessed by comparing the third observed vancomycin concentration per patient with the corresponding model prediction. Prediction was based on covariates alone (<i>a priori</i>) or covariates and TDM measurements (Bayesian). Predictive performance was quantified by a median prediction error (MPE) for accuracy and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) for precision. MPE ranged between -199.6% and 93.3% (<i>a priori</i>) and between -50.6% and 19.1% (Bayesian), while MAPE ranged between 31.6% and 199.6% (<i>a priori</i>) and between 19.8% and 53.5% (Bayesian). The Okada et al. model was one of the most accurate and precise models in the <i>a priori</i> (MPE: -4%; MAPE: 31.6%) and Bayesian scenario (MPE: -6.9%; MAPE: 19.8%). The model published by Okada et al. was developed in allo-HSCT patients. That may explain the high predictive performance, especially in the <i>a priori</i> scenario. We recommend the Okada et al. model for future TDM in allo-HSCT patients.

Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyVol. 69(10)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.