Impact of the Atomic Structure at the BiVO<sub>4</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> Interface on the Electronic Properties and Performance of BiVO<sub>4</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> Photoanodes

In photoelectrochemical cells, semiconductor electrodes are usually interfaced with protection layers to extend their stability. Ideally, the protection layer should not decrease photocurrent generation. Hence, the conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM) of the protection layer should appropriately align with those of the underlying semiconductor electrode to facilitate the desired interfacial charge transfer with minimal interfacial recombination. However, predicting interfacial band alignment can be challenging, as it may vary depending on the detailed interfacial atomic structure. Investigating the effect of the atomic structure at the semiconductor/protection layer junction on the band alignment is also challenging as it requires samples with varied interfaces without altering the semiconductor and protection layers. Here, we considered TiO<sub>2</sub>, the most widely used material as a protection layer, interfaced with a BiVO<sub>4</sub> photoanode, and we fabricated two n-type BiVO<sub>4</sub>(010)/TiO<sub>2</sub> photoanodes where a thin (∼4 nm) amorphous TiO<sub>2</sub> layer was deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD). While the individual BiVO<sub>4</sub>(010) and TiO<sub>2</sub> layers were identical in these two samples, we modified the interfacial atomic structure at the BiVO<sub>4</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> junction by changing which precursor, Ti or O, was introduced first upon deposition of TiO<sub>2</sub>. By experimentally and computationally investigating the differences in these two samples, we show that the band alignments between BiVO<sub>4</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> at the interface may not be straightforwardly predicted by the CBM and VBM of bulk BiVO<sub>4</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> and that interfacial atomic arrangements can have a marked impact on the electronic properties and photoelectrochemical performance of the BiVO<sub>4</sub>(010)/TiO<sub>2</sub> photoanode.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c07695
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the Atomic Structure at the BiVO4/TiO2 Interface on the Electronic Properties and Performance of BiVO4/TiO2 Photoanodes

Kana Ishisone, Kyoung‐Shin Choi, Daye Seo, Jiawei Zhan et al.
5 citations
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
6.23
article

Impact of the Atomic Structure at the BiVO4/TiO2 Interface on the Electronic Properties and Performance of BiVO4/TiO2 Photoanodes

Kana Ishisone, Kyoung‐Shin Choi, Daye Seo, Jiawei Zhan, Zifan Ye, Zhaoyi Xi, Dae Han Wi, Mingzhao Liu, Xiao Tong, Giulia Galli
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In photoelectrochemical cells, semiconductor electrodes are usually interfaced with protection layers to extend their stability. Ideally, the protection layer should not decrease photocurrent generation. Hence, the conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM) of the protection layer should appropriately align with those of the underlying semiconductor electrode to facilitate the desired interfacial charge transfer with minimal interfacial recombination. However, predicting interfacial band alignment can be challenging, as it may vary depending on the detailed interfacial atomic structure. Investigating the effect of the atomic structure at the semiconductor/protection layer junction on the band alignment is also challenging as it requires samples with varied interfaces without altering the semiconductor and protection layers. Here, we considered TiO<sub>2</sub>, the most widely used material as a protection layer, interfaced with a BiVO<sub>4</sub> photoanode, and we fabricated two n-type BiVO<sub>4</sub>(010)/TiO<sub>2</sub> photoanodes where a thin (∼4 nm) amorphous TiO<sub>2</sub> layer was deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD). While the individual BiVO<sub>4</sub>(010) and TiO<sub>2</sub> layers were identical in these two samples, we modified the interfacial atomic structure at the BiVO<sub>4</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> junction by changing which precursor, Ti or O, was introduced first upon deposition of TiO<sub>2</sub>. By experimentally and computationally investigating the differences in these two samples, we show that the band alignments between BiVO<sub>4</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> at the interface may not be straightforwardly predicted by the CBM and VBM of bulk BiVO<sub>4</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> and that interfacial atomic arrangements can have a marked impact on the electronic properties and photoelectrochemical performance of the BiVO<sub>4</sub>(010)/TiO<sub>2</sub> photoanode.

Journal of the American Chemical SocietyVol. 147(34)
Argonne National Laboratory (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Chungnam National University (KR), Brookhaven National Laboratory (US), University of Chicago (US), Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
6.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.