Long-Term Outcomes of Persistent Critical Illness

<b>Rationale:</b> The term "persistent critical illness" (PerCI; defined as an ICU stay of ⩾10 or more days) refers to the condition of a growing group of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) whose critical illness persists into chronicity. These patients account for a disproportionate amount of resources, yet long-term functional outcomes are unknown. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to compare death or new disability at 6 months in ICU patients with and without <b>Methods:</b> We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study that was conducted in six metropolitan ICUs. Participants were adults admitted to an ICU who received more than 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. Patients who died before Day 10 were excluded from the control group. The primary outcome was death or new disability at 6 months, adjusted for various covariates, with new disability defined as a ⩾10% increase from baseline as measured with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. We included various secondary outcomes (e.g., quality of life, cognition, mental health, return to work) to assess recovery holistically at 3 and 6 months. A significance level of 0.01 was used to compensate for multiplicity. <b>Results:</b> Of 888 total enrolled patients, 799 survived to Day 10. Of these, the primary outcome was available in 670 (84%) patients, 188 with PerCI and 482 in the control group. The primary outcome was present in 124/171 (72.5%) of patients with PerCI and 246/457 (53.8%) of the control group: adjusted risk difference, 10.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.47-20.90; <i>P</i> = 0.040. At 6 months, the mortality rate was higher in the PerCI group compared with the control group: 76/252 (30.2%) and 57/547 (10.4%), respectively (adjusted risk difference, 15.04; 95% CI = 9.65-20.39; <i>P</i> < 0.001). In survivors, 48/95 (50.5%) of the PerCI group developed a new disability, compared with 100/311 (32.2%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, 9.98; 95% CI = -0.27, 20.20; <i>P</i> = 0.056). Assessment of secondary outcomes showed several differences at 3 months that were reduced by 6 months, and residual differences were largely related to physical function. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with PerCI had a similar incidence of death or new disability at 6 months. However, an assessment of secondary outcomes showed significant recovery in survivors of PerCI between 3 and 6 months.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202410-1044oc
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Outcomes of Persistent Critical Illness

Carol Lynette Hodgson, Ary Serpa Neto, Alisa M. Higgins, L Q He
1 citations
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
1.55
article

Long-Term Outcomes of Persistent Critical Illness

Carol Lynette Hodgson, Ary Serpa Neto, Alisa M. Higgins, L Q He
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> The term "persistent critical illness" (PerCI; defined as an ICU stay of ⩾10 or more days) refers to the condition of a growing group of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) whose critical illness persists into chronicity. These patients account for a disproportionate amount of resources, yet long-term functional outcomes are unknown. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to compare death or new disability at 6 months in ICU patients with and without <b>Methods:</b> We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study that was conducted in six metropolitan ICUs. Participants were adults admitted to an ICU who received more than 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. Patients who died before Day 10 were excluded from the control group. The primary outcome was death or new disability at 6 months, adjusted for various covariates, with new disability defined as a ⩾10% increase from baseline as measured with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. We included various secondary outcomes (e.g., quality of life, cognition, mental health, return to work) to assess recovery holistically at 3 and 6 months. A significance level of 0.01 was used to compensate for multiplicity. <b>Results:</b> Of 888 total enrolled patients, 799 survived to Day 10. Of these, the primary outcome was available in 670 (84%) patients, 188 with PerCI and 482 in the control group. The primary outcome was present in 124/171 (72.5%) of patients with PerCI and 246/457 (53.8%) of the control group: adjusted risk difference, 10.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.47-20.90; <i>P</i> = 0.040. At 6 months, the mortality rate was higher in the PerCI group compared with the control group: 76/252 (30.2%) and 57/547 (10.4%), respectively (adjusted risk difference, 15.04; 95% CI = 9.65-20.39; <i>P</i> < 0.001). In survivors, 48/95 (50.5%) of the PerCI group developed a new disability, compared with 100/311 (32.2%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, 9.98; 95% CI = -0.27, 20.20; <i>P</i> = 0.056). Assessment of secondary outcomes showed several differences at 3 months that were reduced by 6 months, and residual differences were largely related to physical function. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with PerCI had a similar incidence of death or new disability at 6 months. However, an assessment of secondary outcomes showed significant recovery in survivors of PerCI between 3 and 6 months.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(12)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Monash Health (AU), Australian Physiotherapy Association (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Austin Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.