Protocol to establish standards for the elements of infection prevention and control programs and practice and competency standards for infection control professionals in Australian hospitals

Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are the most frequent hospital-acquired complication, resulting in significant mortality, disability, and system-level costs in Australian hospitals. Many HAIs can be prevented with appropriate infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, including IPC programs led by infection control professionals (ICPs). Despite recent improvements in hospital IPC practices in Australia, such as the introduction of National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards for hospital accreditation, there are currently no evidence-based minimum standards for the content, composition, and governance of IPC programs, nor the identification of their core elements. Furthermore, there is a similar lack of evidence-based minimum standards guiding the practice requirements, skills, and competencies of hospital ICPs. This protocol outlines a sequential three-phase research design to establish the core requirements for the elements and governance of IPC programs, as well as minimum practice standards for ICPs in Australian hospitals. Phase 1 will involve two integrative reviews to synthesise the elements and governance systems of international IPC programs, and the competencies, education and practice standards for hospital ICPs globally. Phase 2 will use survey and interview methodologies to examine the current content and structure of IPC programs and governance systems in Australian hospitals, as well as the academic and professional content of IPC education and training courses for ICPs in Australia. In Phase 3, a modified electronic Delphi study will be conducted to generate expert consensus on the core requirements of Australian hospital IPC programs and systems of governance, and the professional practice, qualifications and competencies for Australian ICPs. The outcomes of Phase 3 will form the basis for the development of new standards that aim to equip the Australian acute care sector to deliver evidence-based IPC practices, education, resources, and governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330221
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protocol to establish standards for the elements of infection prevention and control programs and practice and competency standards for infection control professionals in Australian hospitals

Kate Anne Curtis, Deborough Macbeth, Catherine Viengkham, Philip L. Russo et al.
PLoS ONE
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Protocol to establish standards for the elements of infection prevention and control programs and practice and competency standards for infection control professionals in Australian hospitals

Kate Anne Curtis, Deborough Macbeth, Catherine Viengkham, Philip L. Russo, Michael J. Powell, Christine E. Gee, Matthew O’Sullivan, Julie Considine, Belinda Henderson, Ramon Z. Shaban, N. Deborah Friedman, BRETT G. MITCHELL, Peter Collignon, Kathy Dempsey, Mary Wyer, Donna Waters, Anne Wells, Frances T. Sheehan, Sam Butenko, Yana Albrey, Lisa Nicolaou
article en

Abstract

Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are the most frequent hospital-acquired complication, resulting in significant mortality, disability, and system-level costs in Australian hospitals. Many HAIs can be prevented with appropriate infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, including IPC programs led by infection control professionals (ICPs). Despite recent improvements in hospital IPC practices in Australia, such as the introduction of National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards for hospital accreditation, there are currently no evidence-based minimum standards for the content, composition, and governance of IPC programs, nor the identification of their core elements. Furthermore, there is a similar lack of evidence-based minimum standards guiding the practice requirements, skills, and competencies of hospital ICPs. This protocol outlines a sequential three-phase research design to establish the core requirements for the elements and governance of IPC programs, as well as minimum practice standards for ICPs in Australian hospitals. Phase 1 will involve two integrative reviews to synthesise the elements and governance systems of international IPC programs, and the competencies, education and practice standards for hospital ICPs globally. Phase 2 will use survey and interview methodologies to examine the current content and structure of IPC programs and governance systems in Australian hospitals, as well as the academic and professional content of IPC education and training courses for ICPs in Australia. In Phase 3, a modified electronic Delphi study will be conducted to generate expert consensus on the core requirements of Australian hospital IPC programs and systems of governance, and the professional practice, qualifications and competencies for Australian ICPs. The outcomes of Phase 3 will form the basis for the development of new standards that aim to equip the Australian acute care sector to deliver evidence-based IPC practices, education, resources, and governance.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Queensland Health (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Avondale University (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Toowoomba Hospital (AU), Government of Western Australia Department of Health (AU), Wollongong Hospital (AU), Australian Government (AU), Canberra Hospital (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU), Cabrini Hospital (AU), Eastern Health (AU), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Northern Territory Health Services (AU), SA Health (AU), Australian Physiotherapy Association (AU), Westmead Institute (AU), Mental Health Commission (AU), Central Coast Local Health District (AU), Act Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.