Improving Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection with a Multimodal Machine Learning Approach: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study

Purpose To develop and prospectively validate a clinical and radiologic model to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using biparametric MRI (bpMRI). Materials and Methods Retrospective data (acquired before March 31, 2022) from 12 medical centers were collected. Radiomic features were extracted from the whole prostate gland using segmentations generated by an automatic deep learning algorithm. A model incorporating bpMRI radiomics, age, prostate-specific antigens, the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), and the prostate zone lesion location was trained. A retrospective validation set and prospective data (acquired after March 31, 2022) were used to compare PI-RADS scoring (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] and specificity at PI-RADS >3). Sensitivity analyses for sequence (T2-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion-weighted imaging) and scanner vendor (GE, Philips, Siemens) were performed, in addition to fairness analyses for relevant categories. Results The retrospective dataset for model development included 7157 male patients (mean age, 64.78 years; 3342 [46.7%] with csPCa), and the prospective dataset for model validation included 1629 patients (mean age, 66.19 years; 592 [36.3%] with csPCa). The multimodal model outperformed PI-RADS in the retrospective (AUC, 0.88 vs 0.80, <i>P</i> = .005; specificity of 71% vs 58%, <i>P</i> = .002) and prospective validation sets (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.85, <i>P</i> < .001; specificity of 77% vs 66%, <i>P</i> < .001), leading to 22.7% fewer biopsies compared with PI-RADS. Sensitivity analyses showed the importance of multiple sequences and vendors in achieving model generalization, as using specific sequences or vendors alone led to worse performance. Fairness analysis showed generalizability across different categories but highlighted increased sensitivity with higher PI-RADS and reduced performance in one medical center. Conclusion A multimodal model provided a temporally generalizable predictor of csPCa that outperformed PI-RADS. <b>Keywords:</b> Algorithm Development, Machine Learning, Model Validation, Model Training, Genital/Reproductive, Neoplasms-Primary, Oncology, Comparative Studies, Technology Assessment <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240507
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection with a Multimodal Machine Learning Approach: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study

Carlos Bilreiro, Ines de Santiago, Ana Mascarenhas Gaivão, Kostas Marias et al.
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Improving Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection with a Multimodal Machine Learning Approach: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study

Carlos Bilreiro, Ines de Santiago, Ana Mascarenhas Gaivão, Kostas Marias, Raquel Moreno, Nickolas Papanikolaou, Daniele Regge, Ana Sofia Castro Verde, Ana Carolina Rodrigues, Sara Belião, José Guilherme de Almeida, Manolis Tsiknakis, Joana Ip, Sara Silva, Inês Domingues, Nuno M. Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

Purpose To develop and prospectively validate a clinical and radiologic model to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using biparametric MRI (bpMRI). Materials and Methods Retrospective data (acquired before March 31, 2022) from 12 medical centers were collected. Radiomic features were extracted from the whole prostate gland using segmentations generated by an automatic deep learning algorithm. A model incorporating bpMRI radiomics, age, prostate-specific antigens, the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), and the prostate zone lesion location was trained. A retrospective validation set and prospective data (acquired after March 31, 2022) were used to compare PI-RADS scoring (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] and specificity at PI-RADS >3). Sensitivity analyses for sequence (T2-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion-weighted imaging) and scanner vendor (GE, Philips, Siemens) were performed, in addition to fairness analyses for relevant categories. Results The retrospective dataset for model development included 7157 male patients (mean age, 64.78 years; 3342 [46.7%] with csPCa), and the prospective dataset for model validation included 1629 patients (mean age, 66.19 years; 592 [36.3%] with csPCa). The multimodal model outperformed PI-RADS in the retrospective (AUC, 0.88 vs 0.80, <i>P</i> = .005; specificity of 71% vs 58%, <i>P</i> = .002) and prospective validation sets (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.85, <i>P</i> < .001; specificity of 77% vs 66%, <i>P</i> < .001), leading to 22.7% fewer biopsies compared with PI-RADS. Sensitivity analyses showed the importance of multiple sequences and vendors in achieving model generalization, as using specific sequences or vendors alone led to worse performance. Fairness analysis showed generalizability across different categories but highlighted increased sensitivity with higher PI-RADS and reduced performance in one medical center. Conclusion A multimodal model provided a temporally generalizable predictor of csPCa that outperformed PI-RADS. <b>Keywords:</b> Algorithm Development, Machine Learning, Model Validation, Model Training, Genital/Reproductive, Neoplasms-Primary, Oncology, Comparative Studies, Technology Assessment <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025.

Radiology Imaging CancerVol. 7(5)
Champalimaud Foundation (PT), University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra (PT), IPO Porto (PT), FORTH Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics (GR), Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.