Uniaxial compressive strength of cemented coal gangue backfill based on response surface methodology

Cemented Coal Gangue Backfill (CCGB) plays a pivotal role in sustainable mining practices, as its uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) directly dictates backfill stability, mining safety, and operational efficiency. However, existing research has yet to fully elucidate how key mix proportion parameters synergistically influence UCS across different curing stages, leaving a critical gap in optimizing CCGB performance. This study addresses this limitation by systematically investigating the factors governing CCGB's UCS under varied mix designs. First, single-factor tests identified optimal ranges for critical variables: mass concentration (80%-81%), fly ash content (3-4 kg), and fine gangue ratio (35%-45%). Using the response surface method (RSM), we then developed quadratic polynomial regression models for 1-day and 28-day UCS, which demonstrated excellent fit with R² values of 0.9672 and 0.9575, respectively. Our results reveal that the interaction between mass concentration and fly ash content exerts a more significant impact on UCS than the fine gangue ratio alone. Additionally, microscopic analysis indicates that during hydration, pozzolanic reactions and cement hydration reactions proceed in alternation rather than isolation-a mechanism previously underexplored in literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14635-3
Primary Topic
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uniaxial compressive strength of cemented coal gangue backfill based on response surface methodology

Zhenghao Jin, Ke Deng, Ying Han, Ziqi Zhu et al.
Scientific Reports
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
article

Uniaxial compressive strength of cemented coal gangue backfill based on response surface methodology

Zhenghao Jin, Ke Deng, Ying Han, Ziqi Zhu, Tingyan Shi
article en

Abstract

Cemented Coal Gangue Backfill (CCGB) plays a pivotal role in sustainable mining practices, as its uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) directly dictates backfill stability, mining safety, and operational efficiency. However, existing research has yet to fully elucidate how key mix proportion parameters synergistically influence UCS across different curing stages, leaving a critical gap in optimizing CCGB performance. This study addresses this limitation by systematically investigating the factors governing CCGB's UCS under varied mix designs. First, single-factor tests identified optimal ranges for critical variables: mass concentration (80%-81%), fly ash content (3-4 kg), and fine gangue ratio (35%-45%). Using the response surface method (RSM), we then developed quadratic polynomial regression models for 1-day and 28-day UCS, which demonstrated excellent fit with R² values of 0.9672 and 0.9575, respectively. Our results reveal that the interaction between mass concentration and fly ash content exerts a more significant impact on UCS than the fine gangue ratio alone. Additionally, microscopic analysis indicates that during hydration, pozzolanic reactions and cement hydration reactions proceed in alternation rather than isolation-a mechanism previously underexplored in literature.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Henan University (CN), Kaifeng University (CN), Karamay Central Hospital (CN), Karamay Central Hospital of Xinjiang (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.