Whose values are driving the design of robot swarms for humanitarian aid?

Robot swarms hold significant promise for humanitarian aid, offering scalable, autonomous solutions for search and rescue, aid delivery, and disaster response. Their ability to self-organise, adapt, and operate in hazardous or inaccessible environments makes them particularly well-suited to crisis scenarios. However, their effectiveness and safety depend not only on technical performance but also on how well they are designed with affected communities in mind. In conflict and post-disaster settings- - often in the Global South- - these systems risk being misinterpreted or rejected if deployed without culturally sensitive, participatory design, especially given that most swarm technologies are developed in the Global North. This article advocates for a shift toward participatory swarm design, an approach that integrates local knowledge, values, and perceptions into system development. It highlights the critical role of human-swarm interaction (HSI) in fostering trust, preventing miscommunication, and enabling safe deployment. By involving communities from the outset, designers can create swarm systems that are not only technically capable but also culturally appropriate, widely accepted, and truly effective in the contexts they aim to serve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Humanities
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013426
Primary Topic
African Studies and Geopolitics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose values are driving the design of robot swarms for humanitarian aid?

Razanne Abu-Aisheh
Medical Humanities
African Studies and Geopolitics
article

Whose values are driving the design of robot swarms for humanitarian aid?

Razanne Abu-Aisheh
article en

Abstract

Robot swarms hold significant promise for humanitarian aid, offering scalable, autonomous solutions for search and rescue, aid delivery, and disaster response. Their ability to self-organise, adapt, and operate in hazardous or inaccessible environments makes them particularly well-suited to crisis scenarios. However, their effectiveness and safety depend not only on technical performance but also on how well they are designed with affected communities in mind. In conflict and post-disaster settings- - often in the Global South- - these systems risk being misinterpreted or rejected if deployed without culturally sensitive, participatory design, especially given that most swarm technologies are developed in the Global North. This article advocates for a shift toward participatory swarm design, an approach that integrates local knowledge, values, and perceptions into system development. It highlights the critical role of human-swarm interaction (HSI) in fostering trust, preventing miscommunication, and enabling safe deployment. By involving communities from the outset, designers can create swarm systems that are not only technically capable but also culturally appropriate, widely accepted, and truly effective in the contexts they aim to serve.

Medical HumanitiesVol. 52(1)
At Bristol (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
African Studies and Geopolitics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Whose values are driving the design of robot swarms for humanitarian aid? — Razanne Abu-Aisheh · Medical Humanities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS