Usefulness of intravascular pressure ratio measurement for cerebral hemodynamics in carotid artery stenting patients

The role of intravascular pressure ratio across carotid artery stenosis in assessing cerebral hemodynamics remains unclear. This study evaluated the utility of pressure-wire-based carotid pressure ratio (CPR) measurement during carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. We prospectively enrolled 25 patients undergoing CAS for unilateral ICA stenosis. CPR was defined as the ratio of mean arterial pressure distal to proximal to the stenosis, measured before and after CAS using a pressure wire. We analyzed the correlation of CPR with cerebral vascular reserve (CVR), cerebral blood flow asymmetry index (CBF-AI), and stenosis-related parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal CPR thresholds. CPR significantly correlated with CVR (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.38), CBF-AI, and stenosis severity. A CPR ≤ 0.80 accurately predicted impaired CVR (< 10%) with 100% sensitivity and 89% specificity. The CPR reached 1.0 when the minimal luminal diameter was ≥ 1.96 mm, suggesting resolution of the pressure gradient. No complications were observed with intraoperative CPR measurement. CPR measurement using a pressure wire is safe, minimally invasive, and reflects cerebral hemodynamic status. The CPR may complement imaging-based evaluation and support intra- and post-operative management in ICA stenosis. Further validation in larger multicenter cohorts is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15939-0
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usefulness of intravascular pressure ratio measurement for cerebral hemodynamics in carotid artery stenting patients

Makoto Isozaki, Hidehiko Okazawa, Ken‐ichiro Kikuta, Masamune Kidoguchi et al.
Scientific Reports
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Usefulness of intravascular pressure ratio measurement for cerebral hemodynamics in carotid artery stenting patients

Makoto Isozaki, Hidehiko Okazawa, Ken‐ichiro Kikuta, Masamune Kidoguchi, Hidetaka Arishima, Ayumi Akazawa, Ken Matsuda
article en

Abstract

The role of intravascular pressure ratio across carotid artery stenosis in assessing cerebral hemodynamics remains unclear. This study evaluated the utility of pressure-wire-based carotid pressure ratio (CPR) measurement during carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. We prospectively enrolled 25 patients undergoing CAS for unilateral ICA stenosis. CPR was defined as the ratio of mean arterial pressure distal to proximal to the stenosis, measured before and after CAS using a pressure wire. We analyzed the correlation of CPR with cerebral vascular reserve (CVR), cerebral blood flow asymmetry index (CBF-AI), and stenosis-related parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal CPR thresholds. CPR significantly correlated with CVR (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.38), CBF-AI, and stenosis severity. A CPR ≤ 0.80 accurately predicted impaired CVR (< 10%) with 100% sensitivity and 89% specificity. The CPR reached 1.0 when the minimal luminal diameter was ≥ 1.96 mm, suggesting resolution of the pressure gradient. No complications were observed with intraoperative CPR measurement. CPR measurement using a pressure wire is safe, minimally invasive, and reflects cerebral hemodynamic status. The CPR may complement imaging-based evaluation and support intra- and post-operative management in ICA stenosis. Further validation in larger multicenter cohorts is warranted.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Fukui (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.