Odds Ratio Product as a Biological Marker of Phenotypes of Insomnia

The study investigated differences in objective markers of sleep depth and identified phenotypes of insomnia. Participants were screened with the Insomnia-Severity-Index and clinical interviews and assigned to control (n = 50) or insomnia (n = 69) groups. They completed three nights of in-laboratory overnight polysomnography. We measured the Odds Ratio Product (ORP), a continuous measure of sleep depth (0 = deep sleep, 2.5 = full wakefulness) and calculated: (a) ORP in stages Wake, NREM, REM, (b) percentage of TRT in deep sleep (ORP < 0.5) and full-wakefulness (ORP > 2.25), (c) number/hour of sleep of transient increases in ORP to wake levels (Wake Intrusion Index [WII]), (d) gamma power, (e) frequency of alpha intrusions, (f) speed of return to deep sleep after arousals (ORP-9). We used Latent Class Analysis to differentiate two insomnia groups with 'Objectively Normal' and 'Objectively Poor' metrics. The Objectively Poor group had higher ORP<sub>wake</sub>, ORP<sub>NREM</sub>, ORP<sub>REM</sub>, %TRT > 2.25, gamma power, alpha intrusion, WII and ORP-9 than good sleeper (GSC) and the Objectively Normal group, illustrating evidence of hyperarousal, while the Objectively Normal group was comparable to GSC. The Objectively Poor group had higher %awake and lower TST. Both insomnia groups reported worse sleep and underestimated TST relative to GSC, despite similar objective sleep metrics in the Objectively Normal group. Using novel objective sleep metrics, we identified a subgroup of insomnia with abnormalities consistent with hyperarousal and another with no difference from GSC. Future research should test if these groups benefit from different treatment pathways and thus improve outcomes and time to determine appropriate treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sleep Research
Published
2025-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70169
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Odds Ratio Product as a Biological Marker of Phenotypes of Insomnia

Veronica Guadagni, Kari Lambing, Célyne Bastien, Amy M. Bender et al.
1 links
Journal of Sleep Research
Sleep and related disorders
article

Odds Ratio Product as a Biological Marker of Phenotypes of Insomnia

Veronica Guadagni, Kari Lambing, Célyne Bastien, Amy M. Bender, Bethany Gerardy, Magdy Younes
article en

Abstract

The study investigated differences in objective markers of sleep depth and identified phenotypes of insomnia. Participants were screened with the Insomnia-Severity-Index and clinical interviews and assigned to control (n = 50) or insomnia (n = 69) groups. They completed three nights of in-laboratory overnight polysomnography. We measured the Odds Ratio Product (ORP), a continuous measure of sleep depth (0 = deep sleep, 2.5 = full wakefulness) and calculated: (a) ORP in stages Wake, NREM, REM, (b) percentage of TRT in deep sleep (ORP < 0.5) and full-wakefulness (ORP > 2.25), (c) number/hour of sleep of transient increases in ORP to wake levels (Wake Intrusion Index [WII]), (d) gamma power, (e) frequency of alpha intrusions, (f) speed of return to deep sleep after arousals (ORP-9). We used Latent Class Analysis to differentiate two insomnia groups with 'Objectively Normal' and 'Objectively Poor' metrics. The Objectively Poor group had higher ORP<sub>wake</sub>, ORP<sub>NREM</sub>, ORP<sub>REM</sub>, %TRT > 2.25, gamma power, alpha intrusion, WII and ORP-9 than good sleeper (GSC) and the Objectively Normal group, illustrating evidence of hyperarousal, while the Objectively Normal group was comparable to GSC. The Objectively Poor group had higher %awake and lower TST. Both insomnia groups reported worse sleep and underestimated TST relative to GSC, despite similar objective sleep metrics in the Objectively Normal group. Using novel objective sleep metrics, we identified a subgroup of insomnia with abnormalities consistent with hyperarousal and another with no difference from GSC. Future research should test if these groups benefit from different treatment pathways and thus improve outcomes and time to determine appropriate treatments.

Journal of Sleep ResearchVol. 35(2)
University of Calgary (CA), Brock University (CA), Research Manitoba (CA), Centre de Recherche Industrielle du Québec (CA), Occupational and Environmental Medical Association of Canada (CA), Université Laval (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.