Evidence-Based Practices: Views, Knowledge and Support Status of Special Education Teachers

Introduction: Although the concept of evidence-based practice (EBP) initially emerged in the field of medicine, it has since extended into the field of special education, particularly as the effectiveness of interventions has gained increasing importance. The use of EBPs in special education plays a critical role in achieving desirable outcomes for children with special needs. However, the implementation of EBPs in this field may vary depending on several factors, such as teachers’ perspectives, their level of knowledge, and the support provided by school administrators. Therefore, this study examines special education teachers’ views and educational experiences related to EBPs, as well as their implementation status of these practices and the extent of support they get from school administrators.Method: This study was conducted using a basic qualitative research design. The participants were 23 special education teachers, all of whom graduated from special education programs and had been working in the field for approximately five years on average. The research data were collected online through a standardized open-ended interview approach and analyzed using descriptive analysis.Findings: The responses obtained from the teachers were categorized under four main themes: (1) perspectives on EBPs, (2) training and knowledge related to EBPs, (3) implementation of EBPs, and (4) administrative support for EBPs. The study revealed four primary findings. First, although most special education teachers considered EBPs important, their level of knowledge regarding these practices appeared to be limited. Additionally, it was found that the majority of these teachers had not been trained on EBPs during or after undergraduate education. The third key finding indicated that when teachers provided examples of EBPs they claimed to implement, they occasionally cited practices that were not evidence-based. Lastly, most teachers reported receiving little or no support from school administrators in employing EBPs. This assistance for those who recieved support was primarily limited to physical arrangements in the classroom environment.Discussion: The findings of this study align with previous research regarding special education teachers’ educational experiences and knowledge related to EBPs. Considering the challenges teachers face in implementing EBPs and the lack of support from administrators, there appears to be a need for interventions at both the policy level and in terms of teacher competencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1512341
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-Based Practices: Views, Knowledge and Support Status of Special Education Teachers

Samet Burak Taylan
1 citations
Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi
Family and Disability Support Research
2.31
article

Evidence-Based Practices: Views, Knowledge and Support Status of Special Education Teachers

Samet Burak Taylan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Although the concept of evidence-based practice (EBP) initially emerged in the field of medicine, it has since extended into the field of special education, particularly as the effectiveness of interventions has gained increasing importance. The use of EBPs in special education plays a critical role in achieving desirable outcomes for children with special needs. However, the implementation of EBPs in this field may vary depending on several factors, such as teachers’ perspectives, their level of knowledge, and the support provided by school administrators. Therefore, this study examines special education teachers’ views and educational experiences related to EBPs, as well as their implementation status of these practices and the extent of support they get from school administrators.Method: This study was conducted using a basic qualitative research design. The participants were 23 special education teachers, all of whom graduated from special education programs and had been working in the field for approximately five years on average. The research data were collected online through a standardized open-ended interview approach and analyzed using descriptive analysis.Findings: The responses obtained from the teachers were categorized under four main themes: (1) perspectives on EBPs, (2) training and knowledge related to EBPs, (3) implementation of EBPs, and (4) administrative support for EBPs. The study revealed four primary findings. First, although most special education teachers considered EBPs important, their level of knowledge regarding these practices appeared to be limited. Additionally, it was found that the majority of these teachers had not been trained on EBPs during or after undergraduate education. The third key finding indicated that when teachers provided examples of EBPs they claimed to implement, they occasionally cited practices that were not evidence-based. Lastly, most teachers reported receiving little or no support from school administrators in employing EBPs. This assistance for those who recieved support was primarily limited to physical arrangements in the classroom environment.Discussion: The findings of this study align with previous research regarding special education teachers’ educational experiences and knowledge related to EBPs. Considering the challenges teachers face in implementing EBPs and the lack of support from administrators, there appears to be a need for interventions at both the policy level and in terms of teacher competencies.

Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim DergisiVol. 27(1)
Ankara University (TR)
Ankara Universitesi
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Family and Disability Support Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.