(Counter)-Mapping US Empire in Africa

Abstract This essay scrutinizes the visual configurations that continue to shape critical understandings of Africa and its relationship to war and empire in the twenty-first century. It explores how maps of US military bases simultaneously enable and foreclose critical analysis, reproducing a lingering fascination and preoccupation with US technological and military power. Against theorizations of empire that privilege the spectacular, the omnipotent, and the overtly militaristic, the essay argues that AFRICOM's network of military bases is only one aspect of a much wider set of power formations that intimately shape the lifeworlds of people across the continent. The essay draws on the works of feminist scholars of war, empire, and geopolitics to call for a situated epistemological and methodological approach—one that exceeds the visuality of the military base and that is more attuned to the sensorial, embodied knowledge formations of populations that have been caught in the crosshairs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-12113500
Primary Topic
African history and culture studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Counter)-Mapping US Empire in Africa

Samar Al‐Bulushi
Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East
African history and culture studies
article

(Counter)-Mapping US Empire in Africa

Samar Al‐Bulushi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay scrutinizes the visual configurations that continue to shape critical understandings of Africa and its relationship to war and empire in the twenty-first century. It explores how maps of US military bases simultaneously enable and foreclose critical analysis, reproducing a lingering fascination and preoccupation with US technological and military power. Against theorizations of empire that privilege the spectacular, the omnipotent, and the overtly militaristic, the essay argues that AFRICOM's network of military bases is only one aspect of a much wider set of power formations that intimately shape the lifeworlds of people across the continent. The essay draws on the works of feminist scholars of war, empire, and geopolitics to call for a situated epistemological and methodological approach—one that exceeds the visuality of the military base and that is more attuned to the sensorial, embodied knowledge formations of populations that have been caught in the crosshairs.

Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle EastVol. 45(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
African history and culture studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.