Public climate concern and policy shifts: Understanding the joint impact on carbon prices in China

To effectively control greenhouse gas emissions, the carbon trading system has gained widespread attention as one of the most effective tools. This study adopts a broader perspective to analyse and compare the impacts of two societal forces — top-down climate policy changes and bottom-up public climate concern and awareness — on carbon trading prices in China. The findings disclose that top-down policy shifts and bottom-up public concern exert asymmetric effects on carbon trading prices under different market conditions, with particularly pronounced impacts in the distribution tails. The causal relationships between these forces and carbon trading prices often coincide with major climate policy changes and extreme climate events. This study underscores the importance of a dual-track approach in climate policy design, recognising that effective carbon market stability hinges on both regulatory consistency and active societal engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Finance
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2025.100071
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public climate concern and policy shifts: Understanding the joint impact on carbon prices in China

Haoxi Chen
Journal of Climate Finance
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Public climate concern and policy shifts: Understanding the joint impact on carbon prices in China

Haoxi Chen
article en

Abstract

To effectively control greenhouse gas emissions, the carbon trading system has gained widespread attention as one of the most effective tools. This study adopts a broader perspective to analyse and compare the impacts of two societal forces — top-down climate policy changes and bottom-up public climate concern and awareness — on carbon trading prices in China. The findings disclose that top-down policy shifts and bottom-up public concern exert asymmetric effects on carbon trading prices under different market conditions, with particularly pronounced impacts in the distribution tails. The causal relationships between these forces and carbon trading prices often coincide with major climate policy changes and extreme climate events. This study underscores the importance of a dual-track approach in climate policy design, recognising that effective carbon market stability hinges on both regulatory consistency and active societal engagement.

Journal of Climate FinanceVol. 12
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public climate concern and policy shifts: Understanding the joint impact on carbon prices in China — Haoxi Chen · Journal of Climate Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS