Resilience Readiness Levels for buildings: Establishing multi-hazard resilience metrics and rating systems

The built environment is vulnerable to climate-induced extreme events and natural disasters, which are repeatedly exposing communities to severe consequences and market disruptions. In response, the construction industry is developing resilient technologies for buildings, but the proposed solutions are often not cost-effective, rarely eco-friendly and typically fail to address multiple hazards present in many locations. These shortcomings stem from the absence of a clearly defined framework for quantifying holistic multi-hazard resilience. As a result, investment decisions are ill-informed and technical solutions are sub-optimal. This paper redresses this issue by proposing quantitative indicators and introducing the Resilience Readiness Levels to assess the resilience of buildings, considering multi-domain factors (physical, social, economic, environmental) in single or multi-hazard contexts (heat, seismic, wind, flood). The proposed resilience indices and calculation methods are based on a diverse set of scientific literature and real-world practices, and are demonstrated on Dutch and Italian urban blocks with different local hazards and building layouts. The results show that the multi-domain resilience approach can support informed early-stage building design and retrofit decision-making for single hazards, while aiding prioritization and intervention planning for improving building disaster preparedness in multi-hazard scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105746
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience Readiness Levels for buildings: Establishing multi-hazard resilience metrics and rating systems

Jonathan Ciurlanti, Simona Bianchi, Francesco Petrini, Kyujin Kim et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
1.91
article

Resilience Readiness Levels for buildings: Establishing multi-hazard resilience metrics and rating systems

Jonathan Ciurlanti, Simona Bianchi, Francesco Petrini, Kyujin Kim, Koen de Koning, Zhikai Peng, Stefano Pampanin, Michele Palmieri, Nicu Ciobotaru, Romulus Costache, Mauro Overend, Alessandra Luna-Navarro, Michele Matteoni, Anna Silva, Hamidreza Shahriari, Divyae Mittal, Evdokia Stavridou, Anna Maria Koniari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The built environment is vulnerable to climate-induced extreme events and natural disasters, which are repeatedly exposing communities to severe consequences and market disruptions. In response, the construction industry is developing resilient technologies for buildings, but the proposed solutions are often not cost-effective, rarely eco-friendly and typically fail to address multiple hazards present in many locations. These shortcomings stem from the absence of a clearly defined framework for quantifying holistic multi-hazard resilience. As a result, investment decisions are ill-informed and technical solutions are sub-optimal. This paper redresses this issue by proposing quantitative indicators and introducing the Resilience Readiness Levels to assess the resilience of buildings, considering multi-domain factors (physical, social, economic, environmental) in single or multi-hazard contexts (heat, seismic, wind, flood). The proposed resilience indices and calculation methods are based on a diverse set of scientific literature and real-world practices, and are demonstrated on Dutch and Italian urban blocks with different local hazards and building layouts. The results show that the multi-domain resilience approach can support informed early-stage building design and retrofit decision-making for single hazards, while aiding prioritization and intervention planning for improving building disaster preparedness in multi-hazard scenarios.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 128
Transylvania University of Brașov (RO), Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (NL), Associated Compiler Experts (Netherlands) (NL), Arup Group (United Kingdom) (GB), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.