Against Relational Justice

Abstract In Relational Justice , Hanoch Dagan and Avihay Dorfman defend a longstanding intuition of bilateral normativity. They argue that private law, for the most part, should structure legal relationships so that parties show reciprocal respect for each other’s self-determination and substantive equality. In this critical notice, I argue against the plausibility of their account. My main claim is that a commitment to individual self-determination and substantive equality should be societal and not bilateral. Rather than reciprocal respect for each other’s self-determination and equality within bilateral relationships, those who care about these values should require that private law help secure them on a societal scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2025.10040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Against Relational Justice

Arie Rosen
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence
Political Philosophy and Ethics
8.52
article

Against Relational Justice

Arie Rosen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In Relational Justice , Hanoch Dagan and Avihay Dorfman defend a longstanding intuition of bilateral normativity. They argue that private law, for the most part, should structure legal relationships so that parties show reciprocal respect for each other’s self-determination and substantive equality. In this critical notice, I argue against the plausibility of their account. My main claim is that a commitment to individual self-determination and substantive equality should be societal and not bilateral. Rather than reciprocal respect for each other’s self-determination and equality within bilateral relationships, those who care about these values should require that private law help secure them on a societal scale.

Canadian Journal of Law & JurisprudenceVol. 38(2)
University of Auckland (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.