Combining Layout Requirements, Consequence Modeling & Quantitative Risk Assessment in Safe Buildings Siting in Process Facilities

Abstract This work x-rays the relevance of combining both the oil and gas production facility's layout requirements, consequence modeling using industrial simulation tools, and Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) of credible releases from potential leak sources when analyzing and choosing safe sites for occupied portable or permanent buildings. The work emphasizes understanding the problems, the required task, available options, the requirements, the methodology, and the desired results when choosing safe locations for personnel occupancy in process facilities. The identified scenarios are checked with the layout requirements, consequence modeling, and QRA, depending on the availability of the right resources to either prepare them or use already existing results from the tasks. The authors also presented a similar assessment done for an Oil and Gas Facility considering locating accommodation Camp for contractors on the northern part of its facility's Well Bay, which also has an adjacent Central Processing Facility (CPF). Other considerations of the facility regarding wells on each well bay, spacing, and sequencing of the wells, will be assessed. The efforts of the assessment team, and the resources deployed to analyze the impacts on the proposed accommodation locations from the process facility using this combination for credible releases from the hazardous area will be provided. The results helped to identify all the risks, tolerability criteria (jet fire and pool fire potential at the Well Bay areas for various release hole sizes), and how they affected the siting of personnel accommodation at the originally proposed locations and made recommendations on other identified safe locations within the facility. The industry can apply the gains from this piece of work in choosing locations for occupied buildings to prevent potential safety incidents and to reduce the risks (thermal, toxic, and explosive) to personnel and the public to As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/228729-ms
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining Layout Requirements, Consequence Modeling & Quantitative Risk Assessment in Safe Buildings Siting in Process Facilities

C. E. Onyia, O. A. Ojeyinka
SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Combining Layout Requirements, Consequence Modeling & Quantitative Risk Assessment in Safe Buildings Siting in Process Facilities

C. E. Onyia, O. A. Ojeyinka
article en

Abstract

Abstract This work x-rays the relevance of combining both the oil and gas production facility's layout requirements, consequence modeling using industrial simulation tools, and Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) of credible releases from potential leak sources when analyzing and choosing safe sites for occupied portable or permanent buildings. The work emphasizes understanding the problems, the required task, available options, the requirements, the methodology, and the desired results when choosing safe locations for personnel occupancy in process facilities. The identified scenarios are checked with the layout requirements, consequence modeling, and QRA, depending on the availability of the right resources to either prepare them or use already existing results from the tasks. The authors also presented a similar assessment done for an Oil and Gas Facility considering locating accommodation Camp for contractors on the northern part of its facility's Well Bay, which also has an adjacent Central Processing Facility (CPF). Other considerations of the facility regarding wells on each well bay, spacing, and sequencing of the wells, will be assessed. The efforts of the assessment team, and the resources deployed to analyze the impacts on the proposed accommodation locations from the process facility using this combination for credible releases from the hazardous area will be provided. The results helped to identify all the risks, tolerability criteria (jet fire and pool fire potential at the Well Bay areas for various release hole sizes), and how they affected the siting of personnel accommodation at the originally proposed locations and made recommendations on other identified safe locations within the facility. The industry can apply the gains from this piece of work in choosing locations for occupied buildings to prevent potential safety incidents and to reduce the risks (thermal, toxic, and explosive) to personnel and the public to As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP).

SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition
Renaissance University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Combining Layout Requirements, Consequence Modeling & Quantitative Risk Assessment in Safe Buildings Siting in Process Facilities — C. E. Onyia, O. A. Ojeyinka · SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS