Classification Systems for Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Review and Recommendations

Abstract Purpose of Review There is no single, standardized clinical instrument or biomarker available to categorize traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity that is deemed the official gold standard for classification. Instead, the current approach is to rely on several criteria to establish severity. Recent Findings There are a number of different classification systems in place each utilizing different indicators. Heterogeneity across classification systems introduces a challenge for research recruitment and obscures knowledge on severity-outcome links, thus limiting generalizability across investigations. There is no comprehensive review and summary of these criteria into one single system. Summary We provide a brief overview of TBI and a narrative review of available systems to classify TBI severity. Additionally, we propose minimum standardized criteria that should be reported in TBI research to differentiate between mild and moderate-severe injuries in the absence of one or more determining criteria. Ultimately, such criteria will help facilitate comparison and generalizability across studies that may lead to the development of severity-specific medical interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-025-00504-7
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification Systems for Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Review and Recommendations

Allison Marino, Ekaterina Dobryakova, Michelle Mui, Joshua Sandry
3 citations
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
4.17
article

Classification Systems for Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Review and Recommendations

Allison Marino, Ekaterina Dobryakova, Michelle Mui, Joshua Sandry
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review There is no single, standardized clinical instrument or biomarker available to categorize traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity that is deemed the official gold standard for classification. Instead, the current approach is to rely on several criteria to establish severity. Recent Findings There are a number of different classification systems in place each utilizing different indicators. Heterogeneity across classification systems introduces a challenge for research recruitment and obscures knowledge on severity-outcome links, thus limiting generalizability across investigations. There is no comprehensive review and summary of these criteria into one single system. Summary We provide a brief overview of TBI and a narrative review of available systems to classify TBI severity. Additionally, we propose minimum standardized criteria that should be reported in TBI research to differentiate between mild and moderate-severe injuries in the absence of one or more determining criteria. Ultimately, such criteria will help facilitate comparison and generalizability across studies that may lead to the development of severity-specific medical interventions.

Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ReportsVol. 13(1)
Montclair State University (US), Kessler Foundation (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.