Navigating a landscape of contrasting hunting regimes and habitats: red deer responses to risk and resources

Habitat selection of ungulates is influenced by various factors, with human interactions playing a significant role. Human disturbances through hunting strongly affect ungulate behaviour, often forcing them to modify their habitat choices by avoiding areas where the risk from humans outweighs other habitat benefits. Gaining insights into these dynamics of human‐wildlife interactions is essential for reducing conflicts between hunting objectives and wildlife conservation efforts. Here, we used GPS tracking data of 32 female red deer Cervus elaphus to derive resource selection functions, analysing habitat selection of animals with both hunting and no‐hunting zones within their home range in Berchtesgaden National Park, Germany. Red deer habitat selection differed distinctly between hunting and no‐hunting zones. In the hunting zone, red deer more strongly selected closed forests, indicating a priority for safety. This pattern was particularly strong during daylight hours (i.e. the primary time of hunting) during which they also greatly reduced their movement. During night‐time, when hunting risk was absent, red deer strongly selected open habitats and increased their movement rate. Conversely, red deer consistently selected open habitats and had similar movement rates during both day and night in the no‐hunting zone, reflecting a preference for foraging grounds when not influenced by hunting. Our results highlight red deer's ability to distinguish between and adapt to areas of varying risk within their home range. These insights are critical for targeted wildlife management and conservation. On the one hand, they demonstrated that hunting can be strategically used as a management tool to control red deer habitat use, reducing their presence and thus potentially their impact on specific areas. On the other hand, the finding that hunting distinctly influences red deer habitat selection and movement highlights the value of no‐hunting zones for the conservation of natural behaviour of ungulate populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Biology
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01424
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating a landscape of contrasting hunting regimes and habitats: red deer responses to risk and resources

Juliana Eggers, Michael Maroschek, Rudolf Reiner, S. Michelle Greiner et al.
2 citations
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
3.43
article

Navigating a landscape of contrasting hunting regimes and habitats: red deer responses to risk and resources

Juliana Eggers, Michael Maroschek, Rudolf Reiner, S. Michelle Greiner, Sebastian Seibold, Rupert Seidl, Matthias Loretto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Habitat selection of ungulates is influenced by various factors, with human interactions playing a significant role. Human disturbances through hunting strongly affect ungulate behaviour, often forcing them to modify their habitat choices by avoiding areas where the risk from humans outweighs other habitat benefits. Gaining insights into these dynamics of human‐wildlife interactions is essential for reducing conflicts between hunting objectives and wildlife conservation efforts. Here, we used GPS tracking data of 32 female red deer Cervus elaphus to derive resource selection functions, analysing habitat selection of animals with both hunting and no‐hunting zones within their home range in Berchtesgaden National Park, Germany. Red deer habitat selection differed distinctly between hunting and no‐hunting zones. In the hunting zone, red deer more strongly selected closed forests, indicating a priority for safety. This pattern was particularly strong during daylight hours (i.e. the primary time of hunting) during which they also greatly reduced their movement. During night‐time, when hunting risk was absent, red deer strongly selected open habitats and increased their movement rate. Conversely, red deer consistently selected open habitats and had similar movement rates during both day and night in the no‐hunting zone, reflecting a preference for foraging grounds when not influenced by hunting. Our results highlight red deer's ability to distinguish between and adapt to areas of varying risk within their home range. These insights are critical for targeted wildlife management and conservation. On the one hand, they demonstrated that hunting can be strategically used as a management tool to control red deer habitat use, reducing their presence and thus potentially their impact on specific areas. On the other hand, the finding that hunting distinctly influences red deer habitat selection and movement highlights the value of no‐hunting zones for the conservation of natural behaviour of ungulate populations.

Wildlife BiologyVol. 2026(2)
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), BOKU University (AT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.