An fsQCA approach to identifying pathways for digital-professional integration in engineering education

Amid the accelerating wave of digital transformation, engineering education is confronted with structural challenges such as outdated curricula and a persistent misalignment with evolving industry demands. Conventional engineering programs have historically prioritized professional skills development while overlooking the cultivation of digital competencies, leaving graduates ill-equipped to navigate the complexities of an increasingly digital labor market. This study introduces the concept of Digital-Professional Integration (DPI) and investigates how the integration of digital and professional skills influences the development of vocational competence. Drawing on a case study involving 36 students enrolled in a tourism management program at a higher vocational institution in China, the research implemented a one-month digital skills training intervention. Utilizing Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), the study identifies multiple causal configurations that lead to enhanced vocational competence. Key findings highlight the centrality of market research abilities and information processing skills, alongside the critical role of self-efficacy as a motivational driver. The study offers empirical validation for the DPI framework and contributes to ongoing discourse on interdisciplinary curriculum design, providing actionable insights for reforming engineering education in response to the digital economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05646-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An fsQCA approach to identifying pathways for digital-professional integration in engineering education

Xinrong Chen, Ye Zhang, Zhida Feng
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
4.20
article

An fsQCA approach to identifying pathways for digital-professional integration in engineering education

Xinrong Chen, Ye Zhang, Zhida Feng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Amid the accelerating wave of digital transformation, engineering education is confronted with structural challenges such as outdated curricula and a persistent misalignment with evolving industry demands. Conventional engineering programs have historically prioritized professional skills development while overlooking the cultivation of digital competencies, leaving graduates ill-equipped to navigate the complexities of an increasingly digital labor market. This study introduces the concept of Digital-Professional Integration (DPI) and investigates how the integration of digital and professional skills influences the development of vocational competence. Drawing on a case study involving 36 students enrolled in a tourism management program at a higher vocational institution in China, the research implemented a one-month digital skills training intervention. Utilizing Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), the study identifies multiple causal configurations that lead to enhanced vocational competence. Key findings highlight the centrality of market research abilities and information processing skills, alongside the critical role of self-efficacy as a motivational driver. The study offers empirical validation for the DPI framework and contributes to ongoing discourse on interdisciplinary curriculum design, providing actionable insights for reforming engineering education in response to the digital economy.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Shanghai Polytechnic University (CN), Fudan University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.