Privatization of Military Activities: Private Military and Security Companies and Their Impact on International Humanitarian Law

In recent decades, the international system has witnessed a profound transformation in the structure of actors, whereby the nation-state no longer exclusively holds the means of force or the functions of security and defense. Instead, private entities—particularly Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs)—have increasingly taken on roles traditionally reserved for regular armed forces, including combat operations, military training, logistical support, and the protection of vital facilities. This transformation presents significant legal challenges, especially concerning the legal nature of these companies, the status of their personnel under International Humanitarian Law (IHL), and the extent to which they are bound by its rules and principles. This study aims to analyze the legal status of PMSCs and their personnel, to determine whether they fall under the obligations of IHL, and to examine the possibility of subjecting them to international legal responsibility. It also explores the impact of their engagement in armed conflicts on core humanitarian principles—particularly the principles of distinction between combatants and civilians, proportionality in the use of force, and state responsibility for violations. Moreover, the study addresses the legal void resulting from the absence of direct international legal personality for these companies, which allows them to operate beyond effective oversight, particularly in fragile conflict environments. The study concludes that the privatization of military functions undermines the effectiveness of the international legal protection system, erodes the distinction between civilians and combatants, and weakens the principle of the state’s monopoly on the legitimate use of force. It also shows that responsibility does not lie solely with individual actors but extends to the states contracting these companies, which are legally obligated to ensure their compliance with IHL. The study ultimately calls for the development of a binding and coherent international legal framework to regulate PMSCs, establish effective accountability mechanisms, and reaffirm the foundational humanitarian principles of IHL.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Majallah al-dawlīyah lil-buḥūth wa-al-dirāsāt al-qānūnīyah =
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59992/ijlrs.2025.v4n8p2
Primary Topic
Military and Defense Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privatization of Military Activities: Private Military and Security Companies and Their Impact on International Humanitarian Law

Ayad Alkanani
Majallah al-dawlīyah lil-buḥūth wa-al-dirāsāt al-qānūnīyah =
Military and Defense Studies
article

Privatization of Military Activities: Private Military and Security Companies and Their Impact on International Humanitarian Law

Ayad Alkanani
article en

Abstract

In recent decades, the international system has witnessed a profound transformation in the structure of actors, whereby the nation-state no longer exclusively holds the means of force or the functions of security and defense. Instead, private entities—particularly Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs)—have increasingly taken on roles traditionally reserved for regular armed forces, including combat operations, military training, logistical support, and the protection of vital facilities. This transformation presents significant legal challenges, especially concerning the legal nature of these companies, the status of their personnel under International Humanitarian Law (IHL), and the extent to which they are bound by its rules and principles. This study aims to analyze the legal status of PMSCs and their personnel, to determine whether they fall under the obligations of IHL, and to examine the possibility of subjecting them to international legal responsibility. It also explores the impact of their engagement in armed conflicts on core humanitarian principles—particularly the principles of distinction between combatants and civilians, proportionality in the use of force, and state responsibility for violations. Moreover, the study addresses the legal void resulting from the absence of direct international legal personality for these companies, which allows them to operate beyond effective oversight, particularly in fragile conflict environments. The study concludes that the privatization of military functions undermines the effectiveness of the international legal protection system, erodes the distinction between civilians and combatants, and weakens the principle of the state’s monopoly on the legitimate use of force. It also shows that responsibility does not lie solely with individual actors but extends to the states contracting these companies, which are legally obligated to ensure their compliance with IHL. The study ultimately calls for the development of a binding and coherent international legal framework to regulate PMSCs, establish effective accountability mechanisms, and reaffirm the foundational humanitarian principles of IHL.

Majallah al-dawlīyah lil-buḥūth wa-al-dirāsāt al-qānūnīyah =Vol. 4(8)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Military and Defense Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Privatization of Military Activities: Private Military and Security Companies and Their Impact on International Humanitarian Law — Ayad Alkanani · Majallah al-dawlīyah lil-buḥūth wa-al-dirāsāt al-qānūnīyah = (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS