Comparison of clinical outcomes between flexible antagonist protocol and long luteal phase protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function: a prospective cohort study

The study found no significant differences in primary clinical outcomes between the two groups. However, younger age, higher AFC, higher AMH levels, greater endometrial thickness, higher number of oocytes retrieved, and better embryo quality were significant predictors of clinical pregnancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1526895
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of clinical outcomes between flexible antagonist protocol and long luteal phase protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function: a prospective cohort study

Xueliang Tu, Hao Jing, Shaobin Feng, Yang Chen et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Ovarian function and disorders
1.70
article

Comparison of clinical outcomes between flexible antagonist protocol and long luteal phase protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function: a prospective cohort study

Xueliang Tu, Hao Jing, Shaobin Feng, Yang Chen, Mingtao Li, Tian Ying, Zhipeng Cao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The study found no significant differences in primary clinical outcomes between the two groups. However, younger age, higher AFC, higher AMH levels, greater endometrial thickness, higher number of oocytes retrieved, and better embryo quality were significant predictors of clinical pregnancy.

Frontiers in EndocrinologyVol. 16
Xian Central Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ovarian function and disorders
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.