Health Claims on Botanical Substances Prohibited Pending Commission Evaluation: Case C–386/23, Novel Nutriology [2025] ECLI:EU:C:2025:304

Abstract The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that health claims relating to botanical substances cannot be used in commercial advertising without prior authorisation, even during the prolonged suspension of the European Commission’s evaluation process. In Case C-386/23, Novel Nutriology, the Court clarified that Article 10(1) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 (Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation, NHCR) maintains its prohibition on unauthorised health claims regardless of administrative delays in the assessment process. The judgment provides guidance for food business operators marketing botanical products and highlights ongoing regulatory challenges in balancing consumer protection with commercial interests. This case note examines the Court’s reasoning, situates the decision within broader CJEU case law, and explores potential regulatory reforms to address the persistent impasse surrounding botanical health claims in European Union (EU) food law. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, pp. 9–25

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.10038
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health Claims on Botanical Substances Prohibited Pending Commission Evaluation: Case C–386/23, Novel Nutriology [2025] ECLI:EU:C:2025:304

Andrea Parziale
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Health Claims on Botanical Substances Prohibited Pending Commission Evaluation: Case C–386/23, Novel Nutriology [2025] ECLI:EU:C:2025:304

Andrea Parziale
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that health claims relating to botanical substances cannot be used in commercial advertising without prior authorisation, even during the prolonged suspension of the European Commission’s evaluation process. In Case C-386/23, Novel Nutriology, the Court clarified that Article 10(1) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 (Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation, NHCR) maintains its prohibition on unauthorised health claims regardless of administrative delays in the assessment process. The judgment provides guidance for food business operators marketing botanical products and highlights ongoing regulatory challenges in balancing consumer protection with commercial interests. This case note examines the Court’s reasoning, situates the decision within broader CJEU case law, and explores potential regulatory reforms to address the persistent impasse surrounding botanical health claims in European Union (EU) food law. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, pp. 9–25

European Journal of Risk RegulationVol. 16(3)
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.