Performance Ranks, Conformity, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Sweater Factory

Performance ranking can trigger multiple social incentives for workers. On one hand, it offers status rewards to induce them to increase effort. On the other, better-ranked workers may reduce effort to conform to coworkers’ productivity in fear of social retribution. This paper uses a field experiment in a sweater factory to disentangle the incentives underlying performance ranks. Treated workers receive ranks either privately or publicly. I find that private ranks do not have any effect on average but that public ranks reduce worker productivity. Additional evidence confirms that productivity declines because of workers’ social concerns and their desire to conform to the productivity of their friends. Cooperation between workers decreases too but with limited effect on productivity. The paper illustrates how inducing worker competition may be counterproductive for firms. This paper was accepted by Marie Claire Villeval, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: Financial support from the Private Enterprise Development in Low-Income Countries, Centre for Economic Policy Research [PEDL ERG 4362] and the DFG through CRC TRR 190 [Project 280092119] are gratefully acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01381 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01381
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Ranks, Conformity, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Sweater Factory

Anik Ashraf
Management Science
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Performance Ranks, Conformity, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Sweater Factory

Anik Ashraf
article en

Abstract

Performance ranking can trigger multiple social incentives for workers. On one hand, it offers status rewards to induce them to increase effort. On the other, better-ranked workers may reduce effort to conform to coworkers’ productivity in fear of social retribution. This paper uses a field experiment in a sweater factory to disentangle the incentives underlying performance ranks. Treated workers receive ranks either privately or publicly. I find that private ranks do not have any effect on average but that public ranks reduce worker productivity. Additional evidence confirms that productivity declines because of workers’ social concerns and their desire to conform to the productivity of their friends. Cooperation between workers decreases too but with limited effect on productivity. The paper illustrates how inducing worker competition may be counterproductive for firms. This paper was accepted by Marie Claire Villeval, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: Financial support from the Private Enterprise Development in Low-Income Countries, Centre for Economic Policy Research [PEDL ERG 4362] and the DFG through CRC TRR 190 [Project 280092119] are gratefully acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01381 .

Management Science
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.