Updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale: an item response theory analysis

Many reasons have been proposed to explain why few sexual assaults are reported, including victim blaming attitudes. These attitudes are called Rape Myths and are used to move the blame from the perpetrators to the victim. The uIRMA is the most established rape myth acceptance measure. While the psychometric properties of the uIRMA are excellent, no studies have assessed the latent structure of the scale through Item Response Theory. Furthermore, there is a lack of knowledge on the psychometric properties of the uIRMA with non-binary individuals. Analyses were conducted on a sample of 1636 participants, composed of men, women and non-binary individuals. The uIRMA is discriminating adequately across genders and items. Furthermore, the difficulty level of corresponding items was lower for men than women and non-binary individuals, with men endorsing more Rape Myths at all levels. However, analyses revealed psychometric concerns with the use of the uIRMA among non-binary participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sexual Aggression
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2025.2540632
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale: an item response theory analysis

Ewa B. Stefanska, Nicholas Longpré
2 citations
Journal of Sexual Aggression
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
7.73
article

Updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale: an item response theory analysis

Ewa B. Stefanska, Nicholas Longpré
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Many reasons have been proposed to explain why few sexual assaults are reported, including victim blaming attitudes. These attitudes are called Rape Myths and are used to move the blame from the perpetrators to the victim. The uIRMA is the most established rape myth acceptance measure. While the psychometric properties of the uIRMA are excellent, no studies have assessed the latent structure of the scale through Item Response Theory. Furthermore, there is a lack of knowledge on the psychometric properties of the uIRMA with non-binary individuals. Analyses were conducted on a sample of 1636 participants, composed of men, women and non-binary individuals. The uIRMA is discriminating adequately across genders and items. Furthermore, the difficulty level of corresponding items was lower for men than women and non-binary individuals, with men endorsing more Rape Myths at all levels. However, analyses revealed psychometric concerns with the use of the uIRMA among non-binary participants.

Journal of Sexual Aggression
Edge Hill University (GB), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), University of Greenwich (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.