Histopathological patterns of periapical lesions in root canal treated teeth: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION. Periapical lesions are common sequelae of pulpal necrosis and endodontic infections, presenting significant diagnostic challenges in clinical practice. Accurate histopathological characterization is essential for appropriate treatment planning and prognostic assessment. AIM. To systematically evaluate and summarize the histopathological features, prevalence patterns, and diagnostic concordance of periapical lesions in root canal treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between 2000–2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed histopathological studies of periapical lesions from root canal treated teeth. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and QUADAS-2 tools. RESULTS. Twelve studies involving 1,847 periapical lesion specimens were included. Histopathological analysis revealed periapical granulomas as the most prevalent lesions (50–84.2%), followed by radicular cysts (15–42%) and periapical abscesses (5–35%). Clinical-histopathological concordance was poor, with overall agreement ranging from 51.4–55.8% (Cohen’s kappa κ = 0.059). Larger lesions (> 200 mm²) showed higher prevalence of radicular cysts (92–100%). Periapical scars represented 1–6% of cases. DISCUSSION. Significant discrepancies between clinical and histopathological diagnoses highlight limitations of radiographic assessment alone. Lesion size, location, and duration influence histopathological patterns. The predominance of granulomatous tissue suggests ongoing inflammatory processes despite endodontic intervention. CONCLUSIONS. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of periapical lesions. The poor clinical-histopathological concordance emphasizes the necessity of biopsy examination for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment planning in endodontic practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endodontics Today
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36377/et-0117
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Histopathological patterns of periapical lesions in root canal treated teeth: A systematic review

B. D. Gupta
Endodontics Today
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Histopathological patterns of periapical lesions in root canal treated teeth: A systematic review

B. D. Gupta
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Periapical lesions are common sequelae of pulpal necrosis and endodontic infections, presenting significant diagnostic challenges in clinical practice. Accurate histopathological characterization is essential for appropriate treatment planning and prognostic assessment. AIM. To systematically evaluate and summarize the histopathological features, prevalence patterns, and diagnostic concordance of periapical lesions in root canal treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between 2000–2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed histopathological studies of periapical lesions from root canal treated teeth. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and QUADAS-2 tools. RESULTS. Twelve studies involving 1,847 periapical lesion specimens were included. Histopathological analysis revealed periapical granulomas as the most prevalent lesions (50–84.2%), followed by radicular cysts (15–42%) and periapical abscesses (5–35%). Clinical-histopathological concordance was poor, with overall agreement ranging from 51.4–55.8% (Cohen’s kappa κ = 0.059). Larger lesions (> 200 mm²) showed higher prevalence of radicular cysts (92–100%). Periapical scars represented 1–6% of cases. DISCUSSION. Significant discrepancies between clinical and histopathological diagnoses highlight limitations of radiographic assessment alone. Lesion size, location, and duration influence histopathological patterns. The predominance of granulomatous tissue suggests ongoing inflammatory processes despite endodontic intervention. CONCLUSIONS. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of periapical lesions. The poor clinical-histopathological concordance emphasizes the necessity of biopsy examination for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment planning in endodontic practice.

Endodontics TodayVol. 23(3)
Jazan University (SA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.