Research on Temperature Prediction of Passion Fruit Planting Bases in Southwest Fujian Province

This article utilized hourly temperature, humidity, pressure and wind speed data from passion fruit meteorological observation stations in three southwestern cities of Fujian Province (Longyan, Sanming, Zhangzhou) from 2020 to 2022, as well as national ground conventional meteorological observation stations. BP neural network and stepwise regression method were applied to construct temperature prediction models for the passion fruit planting bases. The results showed that: (1) The simulation effect of the passion fruit station temperature prediction model based on BP neural network (referred to as BP model) was better than that of the model based on stepwise regression method (referred to as regression model). The average absolute error (MSE) of BP model (2.75–3.42 °C) was smaller than that of regression model (3.32–3.94 °C). (2) For the simulation results of daily temperature changes in the passion fruit station, the difference in hourly average temperature between the BP model predictions (regression model predictions) and observed temperatures at passion fruit station was −4.1–4.4 °C (−6.0–10.2 °C). The BP model showed a daily temperature trend that was closer to the measured values; (3) For the simulation results of high and low temperatures in the passion fruit station, the BP neural network model (regression model) showed a prediction error range of −5.6 °C to 5.2 °C compared to observed temperatures, while the stepwise regression model’s error range was −4.1 °C to 8.8 °C. The BP model’s predicted temperature trend was closer to the measured values. (4) Both models have significant shortcomings in the prediction of high-temperature individual cases and hourly averages, with relatively large errors (generally exceeding 3 °C), especially during the period from 10 to 16 o’clock. The future version needs to be optimized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16080961
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Temperature Prediction of Passion Fruit Planting Bases in Southwest Fujian Province

Kai Yang, Shujie Yuan, Hongyi Li, Yuchen Shi et al.
Atmosphere
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
article

Research on Temperature Prediction of Passion Fruit Planting Bases in Southwest Fujian Province

Kai Yang, Shujie Yuan, Hongyi Li, Yuchen Shi, Shiyun Mou, Han Lin
article en

Abstract

This article utilized hourly temperature, humidity, pressure and wind speed data from passion fruit meteorological observation stations in three southwestern cities of Fujian Province (Longyan, Sanming, Zhangzhou) from 2020 to 2022, as well as national ground conventional meteorological observation stations. BP neural network and stepwise regression method were applied to construct temperature prediction models for the passion fruit planting bases. The results showed that: (1) The simulation effect of the passion fruit station temperature prediction model based on BP neural network (referred to as BP model) was better than that of the model based on stepwise regression method (referred to as regression model). The average absolute error (MSE) of BP model (2.75–3.42 °C) was smaller than that of regression model (3.32–3.94 °C). (2) For the simulation results of daily temperature changes in the passion fruit station, the difference in hourly average temperature between the BP model predictions (regression model predictions) and observed temperatures at passion fruit station was −4.1–4.4 °C (−6.0–10.2 °C). The BP model showed a daily temperature trend that was closer to the measured values; (3) For the simulation results of high and low temperatures in the passion fruit station, the BP neural network model (regression model) showed a prediction error range of −5.6 °C to 5.2 °C compared to observed temperatures, while the stepwise regression model’s error range was −4.1 °C to 8.8 °C. The BP model’s predicted temperature trend was closer to the measured values. (4) Both models have significant shortcomings in the prediction of high-temperature individual cases and hourly averages, with relatively large errors (generally exceeding 3 °C), especially during the period from 10 to 16 o’clock. The future version needs to be optimized.

AtmosphereVol. 16(8)
China Meteorological Administration (CN), Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN), Manchester Airport (GB), Education Department of Fujian Province (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.