Relevance of the Sixth IPCC Assessment Report to Indigenous lived realities

This article contributes to Indigenous literature on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports (ARs) for an exploration of the science–policy–politics interface at the global scale. It presents findings from the systematic review of the latest AR6, conducted by the Knowledge Justice Collective, that examined Indigenous content in the report and the scientific knowledge base AR6 is based upon. It shows that paying attention solely on numerical increases of Indigenous content rather than the uneven Indigenous representation in the IPCC knowledge base produced in the English language by researchers largely in environmental science-related disciplines at elite institutions limits our understanding of the nuances of Indigenous lived realities in the ARs. Therefore, without an intervention at the knowledge base level, Indigenous Peoples and Indigenous Peoples’ Knowledges will continue to be legible only through extractive relationships in the IPCC AR processes while continuing to promote epistemic Eurocentrism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801251362621
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relevance of the Sixth IPCC Assessment Report to Indigenous lived realities

Pasang Yangjee Sherpa
3 citations
AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
8.45
article

Relevance of the Sixth IPCC Assessment Report to Indigenous lived realities

Pasang Yangjee Sherpa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article contributes to Indigenous literature on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports (ARs) for an exploration of the science–policy–politics interface at the global scale. It presents findings from the systematic review of the latest AR6, conducted by the Knowledge Justice Collective, that examined Indigenous content in the report and the scientific knowledge base AR6 is based upon. It shows that paying attention solely on numerical increases of Indigenous content rather than the uneven Indigenous representation in the IPCC knowledge base produced in the English language by researchers largely in environmental science-related disciplines at elite institutions limits our understanding of the nuances of Indigenous lived realities in the ARs. Therefore, without an intervention at the knowledge base level, Indigenous Peoples and Indigenous Peoples’ Knowledges will continue to be legible only through extractive relationships in the IPCC AR processes while continuing to promote epistemic Eurocentrism.

AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous PeoplesVol. 21(3)
Institute for Humanities Research and Indigenous Studies of the North (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relevance of the Sixth IPCC Assessment Report to Indigenous lived realities — Pasang Yangjee Sherpa · AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS