In Vitro Skin Models for Skin Sensitisation: Challenges and Future Directions

Allergic contact dermatitis is one of the most common adverse events associated with cosmetic use. Accordingly, assessment of skin sensitisation hazard is required for safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. The transition to the use of alternative methods for testing has made skin sensitisation an intense field in the past decades. The first alternative methods have been in place for almost a decade, but none as stand-alone replacement for the reference murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA). While strategies to combine data from several methods are being evaluated and refined, individual methods face technical limitations. These include issues related to their applicability to highly lipophilic substances and the lack of reliable potency estimation, which remain important obstacles to their widespread adoption as replacement for animal methods. The unique characteristics of in vitro skin models represented an attractive alternative, potentially overcoming these limitations and offering a more physiologically relevant environment for the assessment of the response in keratinocytes and dendritic cells. In this review, we recapitulate how reconstructed human skin models have been used as platforms for skin sensitisation testing, including the latest approaches using organ-on-a-chip and microfluidic technologies, aimed to develop next-generation organotypic skin models with increased complexity and monitoring capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cosmetics
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics12040173
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vitro Skin Models for Skin Sensitisation: Challenges and Future Directions

Leticia Suárez‐Cabrera, Diego Velasco, Paloma Pérez‐Aciego, Ignacio Losada-Fernández et al.
5 citations
Cosmetics
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
3.95
article

In Vitro Skin Models for Skin Sensitisation: Challenges and Future Directions

Leticia Suárez‐Cabrera, Diego Velasco, Paloma Pérez‐Aciego, Ignacio Losada-Fernández, Leticia Valencia, Ane San Martín, Sergio Moreno-Nombela
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Allergic contact dermatitis is one of the most common adverse events associated with cosmetic use. Accordingly, assessment of skin sensitisation hazard is required for safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. The transition to the use of alternative methods for testing has made skin sensitisation an intense field in the past decades. The first alternative methods have been in place for almost a decade, but none as stand-alone replacement for the reference murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA). While strategies to combine data from several methods are being evaluated and refined, individual methods face technical limitations. These include issues related to their applicability to highly lipophilic substances and the lack of reliable potency estimation, which remain important obstacles to their widespread adoption as replacement for animal methods. The unique characteristics of in vitro skin models represented an attractive alternative, potentially overcoming these limitations and offering a more physiologically relevant environment for the assessment of the response in keratinocytes and dendritic cells. In this review, we recapitulate how reconstructed human skin models have been used as platforms for skin sensitisation testing, including the latest approaches using organ-on-a-chip and microfluidic technologies, aimed to develop next-generation organotypic skin models with increased complexity and monitoring capabilities.

CosmeticsVol. 12(4)
Fundación Seimc-Gesida (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Fundación Lair
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
3.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.