Pressure control method for low-pressure vacuum systems based on mismatch-resistant Smith predictor compensation

To achieve efficient and high-precision pressure control for low-pressure vacuum systems, a pressure control method based on mismatch-resistant Smith Predictor (SP) compensation is proposed. First, a control scheme consisting of an SP and a proportional–integral (PI) controller is designed for the internal loop of the system, combined with feedforward control to form an integrated control structure. This approach effectively addresses the issue of sluggish response in control systems caused by the significant delay characteristics of low-pressure vacuum systems. Second, to address the common issue of model parameter mismatch, which arises from inaccurate model construction and parameter identification, a model parameter mismatch compensation mechanism is designed and incorporated into the pressure feedback collection process. Proportional–derivative correction is applied to the feedback signal after SP compensation to mitigate the control signal fluctuations caused by model mismatch; thus, the pressure control performance of the low-pressure vacuum system can be enhanced. Compared to the Mac-pid and AFFPI controllers, the introduction of the SP controller leads to an average reduction in settling time of 41.16 and 12.58 seconds, the overshoot is almost eliminated, and a reduction in integral of time-weighted absolute error (ITAE) by 1304.14 and 74.09, respectively, in the simulation environment. Compared to the SP control method that does not account for model parameter mismatch, the settling time is reduced by 4.36 seconds, overshoot is reduced by 23.20%, ITAE decreases by 13.99, and the variance of the control signal is significantly reduced by 72.37%, in the real experimental environment. These results indicate that the proposed control method can effectively suppress model parameter mismatch issues caused by inaccurate modeling and parameter identification, reduce control signal fluctuations, avoid the performance degradation of traditional Smith Predictor control methods under model mismatch, and achieve efficient and high-precision pressure control in low-pressure vacuum systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312251351353
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressure control method for low-pressure vacuum systems based on mismatch-resistant Smith predictor compensation

Benchi Jiang, Yuan Wang, Lan Huang, Lulu Wu et al.
Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
Advanced Control Systems Design
article

Pressure control method for low-pressure vacuum systems based on mismatch-resistant Smith predictor compensation

Benchi Jiang, Yuan Wang, Lan Huang, Lulu Wu, Dazhu Li
article en

Abstract

To achieve efficient and high-precision pressure control for low-pressure vacuum systems, a pressure control method based on mismatch-resistant Smith Predictor (SP) compensation is proposed. First, a control scheme consisting of an SP and a proportional–integral (PI) controller is designed for the internal loop of the system, combined with feedforward control to form an integrated control structure. This approach effectively addresses the issue of sluggish response in control systems caused by the significant delay characteristics of low-pressure vacuum systems. Second, to address the common issue of model parameter mismatch, which arises from inaccurate model construction and parameter identification, a model parameter mismatch compensation mechanism is designed and incorporated into the pressure feedback collection process. Proportional–derivative correction is applied to the feedback signal after SP compensation to mitigate the control signal fluctuations caused by model mismatch; thus, the pressure control performance of the low-pressure vacuum system can be enhanced. Compared to the Mac-pid and AFFPI controllers, the introduction of the SP controller leads to an average reduction in settling time of 41.16 and 12.58 seconds, the overshoot is almost eliminated, and a reduction in integral of time-weighted absolute error (ITAE) by 1304.14 and 74.09, respectively, in the simulation environment. Compared to the SP control method that does not account for model parameter mismatch, the settling time is reduced by 4.36 seconds, overshoot is reduced by 23.20%, ITAE decreases by 13.99, and the variance of the control signal is significantly reduced by 72.37%, in the real experimental environment. These results indicate that the proposed control method can effectively suppress model parameter mismatch issues caused by inaccurate modeling and parameter identification, reduce control signal fluctuations, avoid the performance degradation of traditional Smith Predictor control methods under model mismatch, and achieve efficient and high-precision pressure control in low-pressure vacuum systems.

Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
Anhui Polytechnic University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Advanced Control Systems Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.