‘This is not necessarily a gender thing’: Gender-blind talk of organisational leaders

How do organisational leaders attend to gender in discussions of men’s flexible work and what are the implications for men’s flexible work? Twelve organisational leaders were interviewed to understand organisational factors that may affect men’s access to and use of flexible work. Workplace gender inequality is related to uneven gendered divisions of work and care. Flexible work has the potential to allow for more equal sharing of care, but it is underused by men. Participants displayed an unexpected pattern during interviews – they avoided talking about men. Inductive qualitative analysis was undertaken, using thematic discourse analysis. Two broad themes were developed from the data, with participants avoiding talking about men, or discussing men and women with regard to traditional gender roles. The themes were found to conform to the theory of gender-blind sexism. Furthermore, we propose an extension of the theory due to a novel finding of gender being maximised. Gender-blind sexism contributes to current understandings of gender inequality, particularly in situations purporting to be gender-neutral, such as modern organisations. We suggest that leaders consider adopting gender sensitive language in order to acknowledge gender, address gender inequality, and facilitate men’s flexible work. JEL Classification: J16, J22

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251355310
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘This is not necessarily a gender thing’: Gender-blind talk of organisational leaders

Anna Chur‐Hansen, Marianne Clausen, Niki Vincent, Shona Crabb et al.
1 links
Australian Journal of Management
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

‘This is not necessarily a gender thing’: Gender-blind talk of organisational leaders

Anna Chur‐Hansen, Marianne Clausen, Niki Vincent, Shona Crabb, Amanda LeCouteur
article en

Abstract

How do organisational leaders attend to gender in discussions of men’s flexible work and what are the implications for men’s flexible work? Twelve organisational leaders were interviewed to understand organisational factors that may affect men’s access to and use of flexible work. Workplace gender inequality is related to uneven gendered divisions of work and care. Flexible work has the potential to allow for more equal sharing of care, but it is underused by men. Participants displayed an unexpected pattern during interviews – they avoided talking about men. Inductive qualitative analysis was undertaken, using thematic discourse analysis. Two broad themes were developed from the data, with participants avoiding talking about men, or discussing men and women with regard to traditional gender roles. The themes were found to conform to the theory of gender-blind sexism. Furthermore, we propose an extension of the theory due to a novel finding of gender being maximised. Gender-blind sexism contributes to current understandings of gender inequality, particularly in situations purporting to be gender-neutral, such as modern organisations. We suggest that leaders consider adopting gender sensitive language in order to acknowledge gender, address gender inequality, and facilitate men’s flexible work. JEL Classification: J16, J22

Australian Journal of Management
Equality Now (US), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.