Development of Formulas Predicting Bending Moments of Elastic–Plastic and Bi-Modular-Layered Particleboards

Four mechanical models were proposed to derive formulas predicting the bending moment capacities of layered particleboard under simply supported center-loading. Experimental validation confirmed these models are effective tools for describing the bending moment development process, including proportional limit, yield, and ultimate points. With predicted and experimental ratios ranging from 0.88 to 1.04, Model 4 can reasonably predict the ultimate bending moment capacity of elastic–plastic and bi-modular-layered particleboard materials. Photo-elastic testing revealed neutral axis shifting toward the compressive side, resulting from the face layer’s significantly higher mean modulus of elasticity in compression than in tension. Additionally, the core material above the centerline of PB thickness contributed to tensile resistance. The proposed mechanical models require inputs such as the tensile and compressive strengths and thickness of each layer, accounting for the asymmetric strength profile and neutral axis shifting. The main conclusion was that the bending moment resistance of the particleboard depends on the combined effect of tensile and compressive strengths of all layers. A 3D plot visualized the PB’s mechanical design space, displaying feasible tensile–compressive strength combinations of particleboard layers. This enables determination of optimal strength properties for each layer. For M2 grade particleboard, the most cost-effective design occurred when the face layer reached a 5.38 MPa tensile strength, with the compressive strength ranging between 13.00 and 18.59 MPa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f16081315
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Formulas Predicting Bending Moments of Elastic–Plastic and Bi-Modular-Layered Particleboards

Wengang Hu, Shunyao Sun, Samet Demirel, Yan Wang et al.
Forests
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Development of Formulas Predicting Bending Moments of Elastic–Plastic and Bi-Modular-Layered Particleboards

Wengang Hu, Shunyao Sun, Samet Demirel, Yan Wang, Franklin Quin, Jing Zhang, Xiaohong Yu
article en

Abstract

Four mechanical models were proposed to derive formulas predicting the bending moment capacities of layered particleboard under simply supported center-loading. Experimental validation confirmed these models are effective tools for describing the bending moment development process, including proportional limit, yield, and ultimate points. With predicted and experimental ratios ranging from 0.88 to 1.04, Model 4 can reasonably predict the ultimate bending moment capacity of elastic–plastic and bi-modular-layered particleboard materials. Photo-elastic testing revealed neutral axis shifting toward the compressive side, resulting from the face layer’s significantly higher mean modulus of elasticity in compression than in tension. Additionally, the core material above the centerline of PB thickness contributed to tensile resistance. The proposed mechanical models require inputs such as the tensile and compressive strengths and thickness of each layer, accounting for the asymmetric strength profile and neutral axis shifting. The main conclusion was that the bending moment resistance of the particleboard depends on the combined effect of tensile and compressive strengths of all layers. A 3D plot visualized the PB’s mechanical design space, displaying feasible tensile–compressive strength combinations of particleboard layers. This enables determination of optimal strength properties for each layer. For M2 grade particleboard, the most cost-effective design occurred when the face layer reached a 5.38 MPa tensile strength, with the compressive strength ranging between 13.00 and 18.59 MPa.

ForestsVol. 16(8)
Zhejiang A & F University (CN), Karadeniz Technical University (TR), Nanjing Forestry University (CN), Hunan Normal University (CN), Jiyang College of Zhejiang A&F University (CN), Zhejiang Academy of Forestry (CN), Mississippi State University (US)
Mississippi State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.