Assessing Decision Thresholds in Primary School Students Using Signal Detection Theory: Validating an Adapted Version of the Beads Task

The decision threshold describes the minimum probability a person needs to be certain enough to make a decision. Lower decision thresholds lead people to jump to conclusions and are associated with superstitious and conspiracy-related beliefs. To shed light on the role of the decision threshold in the development of these phenomena, it is crucial to study decision thresholds at an early age. However, current measures of decision thresholds have only been administered in adult samples and are based on subjective probability estimates. The current study validates a new instrument that was adapted to measure the decision thresholds of children and is based on the objective probability values of a situation by using a signal detection analytical approach. We assessed decision thresholds in a sample of N = 299 children from an extracurricular enrichment program for talented primary school students. Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the new measurement instrument has high accuracy. Furthermore, its construct validity was supported by positive associations with children’s performance in the original beads task, a measure of confirmation bias, age, grade level, and math performance. However, no associations were found with a measure of alternation bias, epistemic certainty beliefs, self-concept in data-related tasks, general self-efficacy, or gender. This study introduces a new instrument for measuring the decision threshold in children using objective probability values and gives insights into decision-making processes and their implications for cognitive biases and related constructs.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cmfbq_v2
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Decision Thresholds in Primary School Students Using Signal Detection Theory: Validating an Adapted Version of the Beads Task

Lucas Stark, Sebastian Kuntze, Jessika Golle, Ann‐Kathrin Jaggy et al.
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Assessing Decision Thresholds in Primary School Students Using Signal Detection Theory: Validating an Adapted Version of the Beads Task

Lucas Stark, Sebastian Kuntze, Jessika Golle, Ann‐Kathrin Jaggy, Jens Krummenauer, Benjamin Goecke, Benjamin Nagengast
article en

Abstract

The decision threshold describes the minimum probability a person needs to be certain enough to make a decision. Lower decision thresholds lead people to jump to conclusions and are associated with superstitious and conspiracy-related beliefs. To shed light on the role of the decision threshold in the development of these phenomena, it is crucial to study decision thresholds at an early age. However, current measures of decision thresholds have only been administered in adult samples and are based on subjective probability estimates. The current study validates a new instrument that was adapted to measure the decision thresholds of children and is based on the objective probability values of a situation by using a signal detection analytical approach. We assessed decision thresholds in a sample of N = 299 children from an extracurricular enrichment program for talented primary school students. Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the new measurement instrument has high accuracy. Furthermore, its construct validity was supported by positive associations with children’s performance in the original beads task, a measure of confirmation bias, age, grade level, and math performance. However, no associations were found with a measure of alternation bias, epistemic certainty beliefs, self-concept in data-related tasks, general self-efficacy, or gender. This study introduces a new instrument for measuring the decision threshold in children using objective probability values and gives insights into decision-making processes and their implications for cognitive biases and related constructs.

Hector Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.