Early-Onset Versus Late-Onset Preeclampsia in Bogotá, Colombia: Differential Risk Factor Identification and Evaluation Using Traditional Statistics and Machine Learning

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Preeclampsia (PE) is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Early-onset PE (EOP) and late-onset PE (LOP) are distinct clinical entities with differing pathophysiological mechanisms and prognoses. However, few studies have explored differential risk factors for EOP and LOP in Latin American populations. This study aimed to identify and assess clinical risk factors for predicting EOP and LOP in a cohort of pregnant women from Bogotá, Colombia, using traditional statistics and machine learning (ML). <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 190 pregnant women diagnosed with PE (EOP = 80, LOP = 110) at a tertiary hospital in Bogotá between 2017 and 2018. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes were collected via structured interviews and clinical records. Traditional statistical analyses were performed to compare the study groups and identify associations between risk factors and outcomes. Eleven ML techniques were used to train and externally validate predictive models for PE subtype and secondary outcomes, incorporating permutation-based feature importance to enhance interpretability. <b>Results:</b> EOP was significantly associated with higher maternal education and history of hypertension, while LOP was linked to a higher prevalence of allergic history. The best-performing ML model for predicting PE subtype was linear discriminant analysis (recall = 0.71), with top predictors including education level, family history of perinatal death, number of sexual partners, primipaternity, and family history of hypertension. <b>Conclusions:</b> EOP and LOP exhibit distinct clinical profiles in this cohort. The combination of traditional statistics with ML may improve early risk stratification and support context-specific prenatal care strategies in similar settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081958
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early-Onset Versus Late-Onset Preeclampsia in Bogotá, Colombia: Differential Risk Factor Identification and Evaluation Using Traditional Statistics and Machine Learning

S Mandlate Jaime, Daniela Mennickent, Enrique Guzmán‐Gutiérrez, Reggie García‐Robles et al.
1 citations
Biomedicines
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
2.06
article

Early-Onset Versus Late-Onset Preeclampsia in Bogotá, Colombia: Differential Risk Factor Identification and Evaluation Using Traditional Statistics and Machine Learning

S Mandlate Jaime, Daniela Mennickent, Enrique Guzmán‐Gutiérrez, Reggie García‐Robles, Mercedes Olaya, R. Ballestero Diego, S. Gilbert Nancy, Carlos Farkas, Paola Ayala‐Ramírez, R de Lima Eduardo, Gutierrez-Monsalve Yanitza, Sanabria Doris, Ospina Catalina, Venegas Manuel, Carrillo-Muñoz Matias
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Preeclampsia (PE) is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Early-onset PE (EOP) and late-onset PE (LOP) are distinct clinical entities with differing pathophysiological mechanisms and prognoses. However, few studies have explored differential risk factors for EOP and LOP in Latin American populations. This study aimed to identify and assess clinical risk factors for predicting EOP and LOP in a cohort of pregnant women from Bogotá, Colombia, using traditional statistics and machine learning (ML). <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 190 pregnant women diagnosed with PE (EOP = 80, LOP = 110) at a tertiary hospital in Bogotá between 2017 and 2018. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes were collected via structured interviews and clinical records. Traditional statistical analyses were performed to compare the study groups and identify associations between risk factors and outcomes. Eleven ML techniques were used to train and externally validate predictive models for PE subtype and secondary outcomes, incorporating permutation-based feature importance to enhance interpretability. <b>Results:</b> EOP was significantly associated with higher maternal education and history of hypertension, while LOP was linked to a higher prevalence of allergic history. The best-performing ML model for predicting PE subtype was linear discriminant analysis (recall = 0.71), with top predictors including education level, family history of perinatal death, number of sexual partners, primipaternity, and family history of hypertension. <b>Conclusions:</b> EOP and LOP exhibit distinct clinical profiles in this cohort. The combination of traditional statistics with ML may improve early risk stratification and support context-specific prenatal care strategies in similar settings.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(8)
University of Concepción (CL), Altera (United States) (US), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CO), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (CL)
Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.