CONTRADIÇÕES ENTRE A CONVENÇÃO SOBRE DIVERSIDADE BIOLÓGICA, ACORDO E ADPIC: UM CONFLITO ENTRE SOBERANIA E DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL

This article analyzes the contradictions between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), highlighting the conflicts between their approaches to protecting biodiversity and sharing the benefits of genetic resources. The research emphasizes how biopiracy, a practice that involves the misappropriation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge, affects the sovereignty of countries and generates environmental and ethical crises. The study reveals that while the CBD seeks to guarantee access and fair sharing of benefits derived from genetic resources, TRIPS, with its emphasis on patent protection, contributes to the strengthening of practices that favor corporate interests to the detriment of the needs of developing countries. The analysis concludes that the lack of effective regulations on biopiracy and the discrepancies between these international treaties result in serious challenges for the protection of natural resources and the promotion of socio-environmental justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aracê.
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n8-089
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONTRADIÇÕES ENTRE A CONVENÇÃO SOBRE DIVERSIDADE BIOLÓGICA, ACORDO E ADPIC: UM CONFLITO ENTRE SOBERANIA E DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL

Émerson Diógenes de Medeiros, Eyder Caio Cal, Daniele de Oliveira Pinto
Aracê.
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

CONTRADIÇÕES ENTRE A CONVENÇÃO SOBRE DIVERSIDADE BIOLÓGICA, ACORDO E ADPIC: UM CONFLITO ENTRE SOBERANIA E DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL

Émerson Diógenes de Medeiros, Eyder Caio Cal, Daniele de Oliveira Pinto
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the contradictions between the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), highlighting the conflicts between their approaches to protecting biodiversity and sharing the benefits of genetic resources. The research emphasizes how biopiracy, a practice that involves the misappropriation of genetic resources and traditional knowledge, affects the sovereignty of countries and generates environmental and ethical crises. The study reveals that while the CBD seeks to guarantee access and fair sharing of benefits derived from genetic resources, TRIPS, with its emphasis on patent protection, contributes to the strengthening of practices that favor corporate interests to the detriment of the needs of developing countries. The analysis concludes that the lack of effective regulations on biopiracy and the discrepancies between these international treaties result in serious challenges for the protection of natural resources and the promotion of socio-environmental justice.

Aracê.Vol. 7(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CONTRADIÇÕES ENTRE A CONVENÇÃO SOBRE DIVERSIDADE BIOLÓGICA, ACORDO E ADPIC: UM CONFLITO ENTRE SOBERANIA E DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL — Émerson Diógenes de Medeiros, Eyder Caio Cal, et al. · Aracê. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS