Framing of the wartime economic situation in Polish business journalism during the Russian–Ukrainian conflict

This article examines how Polish business journalism framed wartime economic developments during the Russia–Ukraine conflict (2022–mid-2024). Drawing on a mixed-methods analysis of 395 headlines from major financial news outlets, the authors combine thematic categorization with sentiment analysis to trace how the media represented key sectors such as energy, agriculture and finance. The findings reveal an early dominance of negative sentiment, followed by a gradual shift toward neutral and notably ambivalent framing – especially in response to complex issues like the grain import crisis and transport sector disruptions. The study highlights ambivalence as a strategic framing device that resists binary evaluations, and reflects the layered economic realities of prolonged conflict. The authors argue that business journalism plays a critical role not only in conveying economic information, but also in shaping public interpretation and institutional response during periods of systemic uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media War & Conflict
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352251356835
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing of the wartime economic situation in Polish business journalism during the Russian–Ukrainian conflict

Rafał Krzysztof Matusiak, Robert Radziej
Media War & Conflict
Media Studies and Communication
article

Framing of the wartime economic situation in Polish business journalism during the Russian–Ukrainian conflict

Rafał Krzysztof Matusiak, Robert Radziej
article en

Abstract

This article examines how Polish business journalism framed wartime economic developments during the Russia–Ukraine conflict (2022–mid-2024). Drawing on a mixed-methods analysis of 395 headlines from major financial news outlets, the authors combine thematic categorization with sentiment analysis to trace how the media represented key sectors such as energy, agriculture and finance. The findings reveal an early dominance of negative sentiment, followed by a gradual shift toward neutral and notably ambivalent framing – especially in response to complex issues like the grain import crisis and transport sector disruptions. The study highlights ambivalence as a strategic framing device that resists binary evaluations, and reflects the layered economic realities of prolonged conflict. The authors argue that business journalism plays a critical role not only in conveying economic information, but also in shaping public interpretation and institutional response during periods of systemic uncertainty.

Media War & Conflict
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO), University of Opole (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.