Cryptocurrency and Traditional Banking -A Comparative Economic Analysis

Operations based on cryptocurrency maintain financial infrastructures that work separately from conventional banking networks. All digital currencies operate through blockchain systems to manage their decentralized operations with digital solutions superior to basic banking functions and standardized management systems. The assessment investigates the value relationships between cryptocurrency assets and normal money provisions together with regulatory oversight and protective measures within the two systems. Both mobile payments and digital currency operations lack any factors which could interfere with their joint operations. The analysis depends on financial statistical data for standardization evaluations throughout this work. The financial industry underwent significant global changes through Bitcoin and Ethereum while Litecoin required changes that led to both positive and negative outcomes for its development. The cryptocurrency supporter group argues that asset-based crypto systems lead to reduced operational expenses and better worldwide financial outreach for wire transfers. Users of digital currency bypass traditional banking intermediaries to achieve faster processing which causes permanent breakdown at traditional banks and creates opportunities for banking customers who were previously unbanked. The cryptocurrency system remains inaccessible to computer users because of inconsistent values and safety risks and regulatory restrictions. Traditional banks invested significant time exclusively to construct their core infrastructure because such measures serve both economic safeguards and public trust requirements and regulatory standards. Standard transactions serve as essential requirements to succeed in international finance operations since banks rely on standardized systems for handling cash deposits and issuing loans while supervising money flows. Traditional bank users tend to give negative feedback due to their sluggish information processing combined with high fees and nonaccessibility to residents of remote locations and undeveloped towns. This paper uses a standardized economic analysis which examines monetary outlays against processing times as well as security procedures between the two banking systems. The research indicates that cryptocurrency provides faster worldwide payment transactions and lower costs than traditional banking procedures. The unstable crypto market shows its main weakness through hacking incidents which combine with fraudulent schemes within cryptographic security systems. Standard banking institutions perform operations at an average speed until they need extended periods for international money transfers. The study analyzes system control of decentralized operations by examining oversight concerns related to cryptocurrency management. Different national governments implement cryptocurrency regulations but several institutions remain cautious since China maintains one of the strictest crypto policies. Traditional banking security needs absolute control which prevents financial method innovation from happening. Finance systems utilizing combined cryptocurrency and traditional banking programs will develop secure systems that provide full benefits needed for worldwide financial institutions serving society across multiple levels. The study proposes academic recommendations to evaluate approaches for cryptocurrency bank integration and to study regulatory effects on business financial operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Integrated Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25215/31075037.008
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cryptocurrency and Traditional Banking -A Comparative Economic Analysis

Abdul Kader Dafader
International Journal of Integrated Research and Practice
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Cryptocurrency and Traditional Banking -A Comparative Economic Analysis

Abdul Kader Dafader
article en

Abstract

Operations based on cryptocurrency maintain financial infrastructures that work separately from conventional banking networks. All digital currencies operate through blockchain systems to manage their decentralized operations with digital solutions superior to basic banking functions and standardized management systems. The assessment investigates the value relationships between cryptocurrency assets and normal money provisions together with regulatory oversight and protective measures within the two systems. Both mobile payments and digital currency operations lack any factors which could interfere with their joint operations. The analysis depends on financial statistical data for standardization evaluations throughout this work. The financial industry underwent significant global changes through Bitcoin and Ethereum while Litecoin required changes that led to both positive and negative outcomes for its development. The cryptocurrency supporter group argues that asset-based crypto systems lead to reduced operational expenses and better worldwide financial outreach for wire transfers. Users of digital currency bypass traditional banking intermediaries to achieve faster processing which causes permanent breakdown at traditional banks and creates opportunities for banking customers who were previously unbanked. The cryptocurrency system remains inaccessible to computer users because of inconsistent values and safety risks and regulatory restrictions. Traditional banks invested significant time exclusively to construct their core infrastructure because such measures serve both economic safeguards and public trust requirements and regulatory standards. Standard transactions serve as essential requirements to succeed in international finance operations since banks rely on standardized systems for handling cash deposits and issuing loans while supervising money flows. Traditional bank users tend to give negative feedback due to their sluggish information processing combined with high fees and nonaccessibility to residents of remote locations and undeveloped towns. This paper uses a standardized economic analysis which examines monetary outlays against processing times as well as security procedures between the two banking systems. The research indicates that cryptocurrency provides faster worldwide payment transactions and lower costs than traditional banking procedures. The unstable crypto market shows its main weakness through hacking incidents which combine with fraudulent schemes within cryptographic security systems. Standard banking institutions perform operations at an average speed until they need extended periods for international money transfers. The study analyzes system control of decentralized operations by examining oversight concerns related to cryptocurrency management. Different national governments implement cryptocurrency regulations but several institutions remain cautious since China maintains one of the strictest crypto policies. Traditional banking security needs absolute control which prevents financial method innovation from happening. Finance systems utilizing combined cryptocurrency and traditional banking programs will develop secure systems that provide full benefits needed for worldwide financial institutions serving society across multiple levels. The study proposes academic recommendations to evaluate approaches for cryptocurrency bank integration and to study regulatory effects on business financial operations.

International Journal of Integrated Research and Practice
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.