ACCEPTANCE OF AUGMENTED REALITY VIA MOBILE DEVICES BY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN PHYSICS PRACTICAL WORK

Augmented Reality (AR) is an emerging technology with strong potential to enhance the educational value of physics lab work. However, its integration in higher education remains inconsistent, often hindered by students' limited prior experience and varying levels of acceptance. This study investigates the factors influencing students’ intention to adopt AR, using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a theoretical framework. A comparative quantitative approach was applied to a sample of 756 undergraduate and graduate physics students, including 334 with prior AR experience and 442 without. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire based on validated instruments and distributed via Microsoft Forms. Results indicate significant differences between the two groups: students with prior AR exposure reported more favorable perceptions regarding its usefulness, ease of use, general attitude, and intention to adopt it. Structural equation modeling (SEM-PLS) confirms that perceived ease of use positively affects perceived usefulness, which in turn moderately influences attitude, the primary predictor of behavioral intention. These findings validate the relevance of TAM in explaining and predicting AR adoption in physics education and suggest that prior experience, while influential, is only one of several factors affecting the successful acceptance of AR in a university setting. Keywords: augmented reality, technology acceptance model, practical work, physics, higher education, intention

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Baltic Science Education
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.611
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ACCEPTANCE OF AUGMENTED REALITY VIA MOBILE DEVICES BY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN PHYSICS PRACTICAL WORK

Abderrahman Mouradi, Laila Ayaichi, Aziz Amaaz
1 citations
Journal of Baltic Science Education
Augmented Reality Applications
1.28
article

ACCEPTANCE OF AUGMENTED REALITY VIA MOBILE DEVICES BY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN PHYSICS PRACTICAL WORK

Abderrahman Mouradi, Laila Ayaichi, Aziz Amaaz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) is an emerging technology with strong potential to enhance the educational value of physics lab work. However, its integration in higher education remains inconsistent, often hindered by students' limited prior experience and varying levels of acceptance. This study investigates the factors influencing students’ intention to adopt AR, using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a theoretical framework. A comparative quantitative approach was applied to a sample of 756 undergraduate and graduate physics students, including 334 with prior AR experience and 442 without. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire based on validated instruments and distributed via Microsoft Forms. Results indicate significant differences between the two groups: students with prior AR exposure reported more favorable perceptions regarding its usefulness, ease of use, general attitude, and intention to adopt it. Structural equation modeling (SEM-PLS) confirms that perceived ease of use positively affects perceived usefulness, which in turn moderately influences attitude, the primary predictor of behavioral intention. These findings validate the relevance of TAM in explaining and predicting AR adoption in physics education and suggest that prior experience, while influential, is only one of several factors affecting the successful acceptance of AR in a university setting. Keywords: augmented reality, technology acceptance model, practical work, physics, higher education, intention

Journal of Baltic Science EducationVol. 24(4)
Abdelmalek Essaâdi University (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Augmented Reality Applications
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.