A Middle Atmospheric Chemistry-Climate Model MACO: Model Description and Simulation Evaluation

Abstract. Developing chemistry-climate models (CCMs) is crucial for advancing our understanding of middle atmosphere and improving whole-atmosphere weather and climate forecasting. Chemical processes play a critical role in shaping the middle atmospheric thermodynamic and dynamic structures. Therefore, CCMs require explicit representation of atmospheric chemistry and must be fully coupled to physical climate components. To this end, a new middle atmosphere chemistry module based on the atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM6 has been developed, ultimately establishing a fully coupled chemistry-radiation-dynamics CCM named MACO (Middle Atmospheric Chemistry with Ozone). This paper introduces the model framework and systematically evaluates its performance through a historical simulation (1970–2014), validated vs. reanalysis and satellite datasets. MACO demonstrates robust capabilities in simulating the key dynamical and chemical processes in the middle atmosphere. The model reasonably reproduces the climatology distributions of major stratospheric chemical constituents, effectively captures the annual cycle of the Antarctic ozone hole and Arctic ozone depletion, and realistically simulates the historical evolution of stratospheric ozone and HCl. However, significant biases persist in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. Analysis identifies two primary bias sources. First, dynamical biases, including a weak polar night jet and polar vortex, lead to a pronounced warm bias near the polar stratopause. This is likely linked to the model’s moderate vertical resolution, which impacts the representation of atmospheric wave dynamics. Second, biases in the chemical scheme primarily manifest as an overestimation of CH4 and N2O and an underestimation of H2O and O3 in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. These chemical biases are partly attributed to the omission of photolysis below 177 nm, particularly the Lyman-α line. Future model development will prioritize enhancing vertical resolution and refining the photolysis scheme to address these identified shortcomings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3636
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Middle Atmospheric Chemistry-Climate Model MACO: Model Description and Simulation Evaluation

Zhipeng Zhu, Ziniu Xiao, Limin Zhou
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
article

A Middle Atmospheric Chemistry-Climate Model MACO: Model Description and Simulation Evaluation

Zhipeng Zhu, Ziniu Xiao, Limin Zhou
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Developing chemistry-climate models (CCMs) is crucial for advancing our understanding of middle atmosphere and improving whole-atmosphere weather and climate forecasting. Chemical processes play a critical role in shaping the middle atmospheric thermodynamic and dynamic structures. Therefore, CCMs require explicit representation of atmospheric chemistry and must be fully coupled to physical climate components. To this end, a new middle atmosphere chemistry module based on the atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM6 has been developed, ultimately establishing a fully coupled chemistry-radiation-dynamics CCM named MACO (Middle Atmospheric Chemistry with Ozone). This paper introduces the model framework and systematically evaluates its performance through a historical simulation (1970–2014), validated vs. reanalysis and satellite datasets. MACO demonstrates robust capabilities in simulating the key dynamical and chemical processes in the middle atmosphere. The model reasonably reproduces the climatology distributions of major stratospheric chemical constituents, effectively captures the annual cycle of the Antarctic ozone hole and Arctic ozone depletion, and realistically simulates the historical evolution of stratospheric ozone and HCl. However, significant biases persist in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. Analysis identifies two primary bias sources. First, dynamical biases, including a weak polar night jet and polar vortex, lead to a pronounced warm bias near the polar stratopause. This is likely linked to the model’s moderate vertical resolution, which impacts the representation of atmospheric wave dynamics. Second, biases in the chemical scheme primarily manifest as an overestimation of CH4 and N2O and an underestimation of H2O and O3 in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. These chemical biases are partly attributed to the omission of photolysis below 177 nm, particularly the Lyman-α line. Future model development will prioritize enhancing vertical resolution and refining the photolysis scheme to address these identified shortcomings.

Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), East China Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.