COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION IN PLANTS USING AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION AND GRID METHODS

This paper presents a numerical investigation of the diffusion equation that models heat transfer in plant tissues, with a particular focus on a comparative analysis of two computational approaches: automatic differentiation and the classical grid-based finite difference method. Diffusive transport is a fundamental mechanism in plant physiology, especially under extreme environmental conditions where the efficiency of heat and mass exchange plays a critical role in plant survival and adaptation. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy, computational efficiency, and stability of the two methods in solving a one-dimensional heat transfer model. The problem is formulated alongside a numerical experiment in which solutions obtained via automatic differentiation—implemented within machine learning frameworks—are benchmarked against results produced by the traditional finite difference approach. The findings underscore the strengths and limitations of each method within the context of biophysical modeling. Furthermore, the results suggest a promising potential for integrating both approaches into hybrid computational schemes to enhance the analysis of thermal and diffusive phenomena in biological systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61586/cwmwo
Primary Topic
Differential Equations and Numerical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION IN PLANTS USING AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION AND GRID METHODS

A.A. BABAYAN, Spartak S Sirakanyan
Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg
Differential Equations and Numerical Methods
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION IN PLANTS USING AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION AND GRID METHODS

A.A. BABAYAN, Spartak S Sirakanyan
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical investigation of the diffusion equation that models heat transfer in plant tissues, with a particular focus on a comparative analysis of two computational approaches: automatic differentiation and the classical grid-based finite difference method. Diffusive transport is a fundamental mechanism in plant physiology, especially under extreme environmental conditions where the efficiency of heat and mass exchange plays a critical role in plant survival and adaptation. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy, computational efficiency, and stability of the two methods in solving a one-dimensional heat transfer model. The problem is formulated alongside a numerical experiment in which solutions obtained via automatic differentiation—implemented within machine learning frameworks—are benchmarked against results produced by the traditional finite difference approach. The findings underscore the strengths and limitations of each method within the context of biophysical modeling. Furthermore, the results suggest a promising potential for integrating both approaches into hybrid computational schemes to enhance the analysis of thermal and diffusive phenomena in biological systems.

Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Differential Equations and Numerical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE DIFFUSION EQUATION IN PLANTS USING AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION AND GRID METHODS — A.A. BABAYAN, Spartak S Sirakanyan · Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS