Designing and building safer schools using two visual methods for teacher evaluation

• Introduces Mapping and Diamond Ranking as tools for evaluating school safety. • Reveals how adult presence and clear spatial definitions enhance safety perceptions. • Identifies privacy and supervision issues in changing rooms as key safety challenges. • Adapts Gislason's model to integrate safety dimensions for school design analysis. • Demonstrates the value of participatory methods in designing safer school environments. Ensuring safety in school environments is a fundamental right for children, essential for fostering learning, well-being, and inclusivity. This study examines how physical design, organizational structure, educational upbringing, and social dynamics interact to influence safety in schools. Given that adult presence and professional judgments are essential to ensuring students’ right to safety, this study analyses teachers’ evaluations using two visual methods to explore how such rights are practically interpreted and enacted in school spaces. Using two complementary visual methods, Mapping and Diamond Ranking, teacher evaluations were analyzed to identify critical factors shaping perceptions of safety. The findings suggest the importance of adult presence, clearly defined spaces, and a sense of ownership in creating safe environments. Conversely, poorly designed areas, such as corridors and changing rooms, were associated with unsafety due to privacy concerns and inadequate supervision. By adapting Gislason’s school environment model to include dimensions of safety, this study offers a framework to understand how design and social factors intersect in shaping safe schools. The findings may provide insights for architects, planners, and educators seeking to foster safer and more inclusive school environments that support educational outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102721
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing and building safer schools using two visual methods for teacher evaluation

Jan Grannäs, Maria Bergström, Anneli Frelin, Karolina Lorentzi
International Journal of Educational Research
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
article

Designing and building safer schools using two visual methods for teacher evaluation

Jan Grannäs, Maria Bergström, Anneli Frelin, Karolina Lorentzi
article en

Abstract

• Introduces Mapping and Diamond Ranking as tools for evaluating school safety. • Reveals how adult presence and clear spatial definitions enhance safety perceptions. • Identifies privacy and supervision issues in changing rooms as key safety challenges. • Adapts Gislason's model to integrate safety dimensions for school design analysis. • Demonstrates the value of participatory methods in designing safer school environments. Ensuring safety in school environments is a fundamental right for children, essential for fostering learning, well-being, and inclusivity. This study examines how physical design, organizational structure, educational upbringing, and social dynamics interact to influence safety in schools. Given that adult presence and professional judgments are essential to ensuring students’ right to safety, this study analyses teachers’ evaluations using two visual methods to explore how such rights are practically interpreted and enacted in school spaces. Using two complementary visual methods, Mapping and Diamond Ranking, teacher evaluations were analyzed to identify critical factors shaping perceptions of safety. The findings suggest the importance of adult presence, clearly defined spaces, and a sense of ownership in creating safe environments. Conversely, poorly designed areas, such as corridors and changing rooms, were associated with unsafety due to privacy concerns and inadequate supervision. By adapting Gislason’s school environment model to include dimensions of safety, this study offers a framework to understand how design and social factors intersect in shaping safe schools. The findings may provide insights for architects, planners, and educators seeking to foster safer and more inclusive school environments that support educational outcomes.

International Journal of Educational ResearchVol. 133
Integrated Cardio Metabolic Centre (SE), University of Gävle (SE)
VINNOVA
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.