Aerodynamic Loading and Wind-Induced Vibration Characteristics of Bridge Girders with Typical Asymmetric Configurations

The bridge girder’s aerodynamic configuration substantially governs its aerodynamic loading and wind-induced vibration characteristics. Extensive research has been performed to optimize the configuration of girders and implement aerodynamic measures to enhance the bridge’s wind resistance. In some practical bridge engineering projects, the aerodynamic configuration of the bridge girder is asymmetric. However, studies investigating the aerodynamic properties of asymmetric girders are limited. In this paper, the aerodynamic loading and vibration characteristics of the Π-shaped girders and box girders with asymmetric bikeways are experimentally studied. Through an extensive series of wind tunnel experiments, the static wind loading coefficients, flutter derivatives, vortex-induced vibration (VIV) responses, and the critical flutter velocities are compared across varying wind direction angles (WDAs). The experimental results demonstrate that the asymmetric girder configurations have different characteristics in both the static wind loading coefficient and flutter derivative in different WDAs. The influence of WDAs on the above-mentioned aerodynamic force coefficients of the asymmetric Π-shaped girder is more pronounced than that on the asymmetric box girder. For the asymmetric Π-shaped girder, the heaving VIV responses at a 0° WDA are smaller than those at a 180° WDA, but the torsional VIV responses at a 0° WDA are larger. Experimental results for critical flutter velocities indicate that the flutter performance at a 0° WDA is better than that at a 180° WDA, especially at positive angles of attack (AOAs) for the two types of asymmetric bridge girders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162824
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerodynamic Loading and Wind-Induced Vibration Characteristics of Bridge Girders with Typical Asymmetric Configurations

Helu Yu, Xingyu Chen, Ming Li, Pinyi Zhao
1 citations
Buildings
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
1.33
article

Aerodynamic Loading and Wind-Induced Vibration Characteristics of Bridge Girders with Typical Asymmetric Configurations

Helu Yu, Xingyu Chen, Ming Li, Pinyi Zhao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The bridge girder’s aerodynamic configuration substantially governs its aerodynamic loading and wind-induced vibration characteristics. Extensive research has been performed to optimize the configuration of girders and implement aerodynamic measures to enhance the bridge’s wind resistance. In some practical bridge engineering projects, the aerodynamic configuration of the bridge girder is asymmetric. However, studies investigating the aerodynamic properties of asymmetric girders are limited. In this paper, the aerodynamic loading and vibration characteristics of the Π-shaped girders and box girders with asymmetric bikeways are experimentally studied. Through an extensive series of wind tunnel experiments, the static wind loading coefficients, flutter derivatives, vortex-induced vibration (VIV) responses, and the critical flutter velocities are compared across varying wind direction angles (WDAs). The experimental results demonstrate that the asymmetric girder configurations have different characteristics in both the static wind loading coefficient and flutter derivative in different WDAs. The influence of WDAs on the above-mentioned aerodynamic force coefficients of the asymmetric Π-shaped girder is more pronounced than that on the asymmetric box girder. For the asymmetric Π-shaped girder, the heaving VIV responses at a 0° WDA are smaller than those at a 180° WDA, but the torsional VIV responses at a 0° WDA are larger. Experimental results for critical flutter velocities indicate that the flutter performance at a 0° WDA is better than that at a 180° WDA, especially at positive angles of attack (AOAs) for the two types of asymmetric bridge girders.

BuildingsVol. 15(16)
Cree (China) (CN), China Railway Group (China) (CN), China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Southwest Jiaotong University (CN), Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN)
China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.