Comparative Analysis of GRU and Bi-LSTM Models for Bitcoin Price Prediction

Bitcoin price prediction is a challenging yet crucial task for traders, investors, and financial analysts due to the cryptocurrency’s inherent volatility and sensitivity to global economic factors. Reliable forecasting models can support for informed decision-making in trading strategies, risk management, and market analysis. This study explores the application of deep learning models as gated recurrent units (GRU), long short-term memory (LSTM), and bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) to forecast Bitcoin closing prices using historical market data. The dataset used consists of historical Bitcoin price data, including daily closing prices, trading volumes, and other key financial indicators. Comprehensive data pre-processing techniques were applied, including handling of missing value imputation, normalization, and feature engineering to uncover relevant patterns. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>), and variance scores, offering a robust framework for comparing predictive performance. Our findings reveal that while the Bi-LSTM model achieved the highest training R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>-score, it exhibited the lowest test R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>-score, indicating signs of overfitting. In contrast, the GRU model demonstrated superior test performance, attaining the highest test R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>-score, and the lowest error values across RMSE, MSE, and MAE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ecti-con64996.2025.11100696
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of GRU and Bi-LSTM Models for Bitcoin Price Prediction

Suchada Sitjongsataporn, Pipat Sakarin, Teranun Kitnapat
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Comparative Analysis of GRU and Bi-LSTM Models for Bitcoin Price Prediction

Suchada Sitjongsataporn, Pipat Sakarin, Teranun Kitnapat
article en

Abstract

Bitcoin price prediction is a challenging yet crucial task for traders, investors, and financial analysts due to the cryptocurrency’s inherent volatility and sensitivity to global economic factors. Reliable forecasting models can support for informed decision-making in trading strategies, risk management, and market analysis. This study explores the application of deep learning models as gated recurrent units (GRU), long short-term memory (LSTM), and bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) to forecast Bitcoin closing prices using historical market data. The dataset used consists of historical Bitcoin price data, including daily closing prices, trading volumes, and other key financial indicators. Comprehensive data pre-processing techniques were applied, including handling of missing value imputation, normalization, and feature engineering to uncover relevant patterns. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>), and variance scores, offering a robust framework for comparing predictive performance. Our findings reveal that while the Bi-LSTM model achieved the highest training R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>-score, it exhibited the lowest test R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>-score, indicating signs of overfitting. In contrast, the GRU model demonstrated superior test performance, attaining the highest test R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>-score, and the lowest error values across RMSE, MSE, and MAE.

Mahanakorn University of Technology (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.