Systematic Evaluation and Experimental Validation of Discrete Element Method Contact Models for Soil Tillage Simulation

The discrete element method (DEM), based on particle dynamics, is used to simulate the technological process of soil tillage using agricultural machinery. A key aspect of the DEM for obtaining accurate agrotechnical and energy indicators of soil cultivation is the formulation of particle contact rules, determined by normal and tangential interactions as well as cohesion forces. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of discrete element method (DEM) contact models used to simulate soil cultivation processes. This study addresses a key issue—the absence of a systematic approach to selecting adequate contact models, which limits the accuracy of predicting soil behavior during interaction with agricultural machinery. A detailed classification of 17 combinations of contact models implemented in the commercial software Rocky DEM was performed, grouped into three categories: normal force models (Linear Spring [LSP], Hysteresis [HLS], Hertzian [HSD]), tangential force models (Coulomb, linear spring limit [linear], Mindlin–Deresiewicz), and cohesive force models (linear cohesion [linear], constant force [constant], Johnson–Kendall–Roberts [JKR]). Experimental validation was conducted by analyzing the angle of repose for various soil types (sandy loam, light loam, medium loam, and heavy clay) with moisture contents ranging from 11 to 31%. This analysis identified the nine most effective combinations of contact models to describe normal, tangential, and cohesive forces (LSP–Coulomb–linear, HLS–linear–linear, HLS–Coulomb–linear, HSD–linear–linear, HSD–linear–JKR, HSD–Coulomb–linear, HSD–Coulomb–JKR, HSD–Mindlin–Deresiewicz–linear, HSD–Mindlin–Deresiewicz–JKR), which showed reliable agreement with experimental angle of repose measurements at approximately 85% accuracy. This study significantly contributes to advancing computer modeling methods in agriculture by providing a scientifically grounded approach for selecting DEM contact models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7080256
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Evaluation and Experimental Validation of Discrete Element Method Contact Models for Soil Tillage Simulation

Lyudmila Kravchenko, Салават Мударисов, Ildar Gabitov, Ildar Farkhutdinov et al.
3 citations
AgriEngineering
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
2.86
article

Systematic Evaluation and Experimental Validation of Discrete Element Method Contact Models for Soil Tillage Simulation

Lyudmila Kravchenko, Салават Мударисов, Ildar Gabitov, Ildar Farkhutdinov, Yakov P. Lobachevsky
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The discrete element method (DEM), based on particle dynamics, is used to simulate the technological process of soil tillage using agricultural machinery. A key aspect of the DEM for obtaining accurate agrotechnical and energy indicators of soil cultivation is the formulation of particle contact rules, determined by normal and tangential interactions as well as cohesion forces. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of discrete element method (DEM) contact models used to simulate soil cultivation processes. This study addresses a key issue—the absence of a systematic approach to selecting adequate contact models, which limits the accuracy of predicting soil behavior during interaction with agricultural machinery. A detailed classification of 17 combinations of contact models implemented in the commercial software Rocky DEM was performed, grouped into three categories: normal force models (Linear Spring [LSP], Hysteresis [HLS], Hertzian [HSD]), tangential force models (Coulomb, linear spring limit [linear], Mindlin–Deresiewicz), and cohesive force models (linear cohesion [linear], constant force [constant], Johnson–Kendall–Roberts [JKR]). Experimental validation was conducted by analyzing the angle of repose for various soil types (sandy loam, light loam, medium loam, and heavy clay) with moisture contents ranging from 11 to 31%. This analysis identified the nine most effective combinations of contact models to describe normal, tangential, and cohesive forces (LSP–Coulomb–linear, HLS–linear–linear, HLS–Coulomb–linear, HSD–linear–linear, HSD–linear–JKR, HSD–Coulomb–linear, HSD–Coulomb–JKR, HSD–Mindlin–Deresiewicz–linear, HSD–Mindlin–Deresiewicz–JKR), which showed reliable agreement with experimental angle of repose measurements at approximately 85% accuracy. This study significantly contributes to advancing computer modeling methods in agriculture by providing a scientifically grounded approach for selecting DEM contact models.

AgriEngineeringVol. 7(8)
Bashkir State Agrarian University (RU), Don State Technical University (RU), Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.