Agricultural intensification degrades arable weed diversity into phylogenetically unstructured subsets of tolerant species

Abstract Context The rise of agricultural intensification (AgI) has severely impacted arable weeds, making it crucial to understand how this process shapes their assemblages across agricultural landscapes. Objectives To elucidate how variation in species composition (beta diversity) among arable weed assemblages respond to AgI gradients, with a particular focus on whether phylogenetic relationships structure these patterns. Methods We analyzed farm-level arable weed assemblages across nine European regions with distinct agricultural management contexts, focusing on in-field AgI indicators (yield, nitrogen fertilizer, pesticides) and landscape context (field size, cultivated area, crop diversity). To examine compositional changes among assemblages, we partitioned beta diversity into its turnover and nestedness components. Results We found positive correlations between in-field AgI differences among farms and the nestedness component of taxonomic beta diversity, alongside a previously reported negative relationship between in-field AgI and species richness. In contrast, the landscape dimension of AgI had a comparatively minor effect. Phylogenetic structure metrics showed weak and inconsistent responses to AgI. Conclusions In-field variation in AgI—rather than landscape context—contributes significantly to taxonomic dissimilarity among arable weed assemblages on European farms, with increasing AgI driving the exclusion of sensitive species and the persistence of tolerant ones, without evidence of species potentially restricted to highly intensified conditions. Traits associated with AgI likely evolved through distinct and complex evolutionary trajectories long before the surge of AgI in the mid-twentieth century, which may explain the phylogenetically unstructured patterns observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape Ecology
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-025-02181-2
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural intensification degrades arable weed diversity into phylogenetically unstructured subsets of tolerant species

Frank Berendse, Vincent Bretagnolle, Manuel B. Morales, Jaan Liira et al.
Landscape Ecology
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Agricultural intensification degrades arable weed diversity into phylogenetically unstructured subsets of tolerant species

Frank Berendse, Vincent Bretagnolle, Manuel B. Morales, Jaan Liira, Irene Guerrero, Rafael Molina‐Venegas, Tomas Pärt, Tsipe Aavik, Mark Emmerson, Jan Bengtsson, Juan J. Oñate, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Teja Tscharntke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Context The rise of agricultural intensification (AgI) has severely impacted arable weeds, making it crucial to understand how this process shapes their assemblages across agricultural landscapes. Objectives To elucidate how variation in species composition (beta diversity) among arable weed assemblages respond to AgI gradients, with a particular focus on whether phylogenetic relationships structure these patterns. Methods We analyzed farm-level arable weed assemblages across nine European regions with distinct agricultural management contexts, focusing on in-field AgI indicators (yield, nitrogen fertilizer, pesticides) and landscape context (field size, cultivated area, crop diversity). To examine compositional changes among assemblages, we partitioned beta diversity into its turnover and nestedness components. Results We found positive correlations between in-field AgI differences among farms and the nestedness component of taxonomic beta diversity, alongside a previously reported negative relationship between in-field AgI and species richness. In contrast, the landscape dimension of AgI had a comparatively minor effect. Phylogenetic structure metrics showed weak and inconsistent responses to AgI. Conclusions In-field variation in AgI—rather than landscape context—contributes significantly to taxonomic dissimilarity among arable weed assemblages on European farms, with increasing AgI driving the exclusion of sensitive species and the persistence of tolerant ones, without evidence of species potentially restricted to highly intensified conditions. Traits associated with AgI likely evolved through distinct and complex evolutionary trajectories long before the surge of AgI in the mid-twentieth century, which may explain the phylogenetically unstructured patterns observed.

Landscape EcologyVol. 40(8)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (FR), Joint Research Centre (IT), University of Tartu (EE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), University of Göttingen (DE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.