Guilty until proven refugee? The EU’s crisis of identity, not capacity / <i>¿Culpable hasta que se demuestre que es refugiado? La crisis de identidad de la UE, no de capacidad</i>

The EU, often portrayed as a defender of human rights, applies starkly unequal refugee policies, reinforcing racial and geopolitical hierarchies. This paper critiques the selective solidarity that welcomes Ukrainian refugees as victims of occupation while framing MENA refugees as security threats or economic burdens. These double standards are rooted in colonial legacies, geopolitical interests and media narratives that shape public perception and policy. Using Critical Race Theory and Framing Theory, the paper examines how systemic biases obscure the EU’s complicity in conflicts that drive displacement. It calls for dismantling racialized hierarchies, holding European actors accountable for their role in sustaining displacement and integrating equity into migration governance to uphold true international protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02134748251361422
Citations
3
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guilty until proven refugee? The EU’s crisis of identity, not capacity / ¿Culpable hasta que se demuestre que es refugiado? La crisis de identidad de la UE, no de capacidad

Jasmin Lilian Diab
3 citations
International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
25.57
article

Guilty until proven refugee? The EU’s crisis of identity, not capacity / ¿Culpable hasta que se demuestre que es refugiado? La crisis de identidad de la UE, no de capacidad

Jasmin Lilian Diab
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The EU, often portrayed as a defender of human rights, applies starkly unequal refugee policies, reinforcing racial and geopolitical hierarchies. This paper critiques the selective solidarity that welcomes Ukrainian refugees as victims of occupation while framing MENA refugees as security threats or economic burdens. These double standards are rooted in colonial legacies, geopolitical interests and media narratives that shape public perception and policy. Using Critical Race Theory and Framing Theory, the paper examines how systemic biases obscure the EU’s complicity in conflicts that drive displacement. It calls for dismantling racialized hierarchies, holding European actors accountable for their role in sustaining displacement and integrating equity into migration governance to uphold true international protection.

International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología SocialVol. 40(2-3)
Lebanese American University (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.