Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic

Background While telehealth utilization has decreased following the COVID-19 pandemic, the incorporation of remote visits into ambulatory cardiology practice guidelines remains a necessity. The aim of this study was to survey cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices post-pandemic, and to propose clinical workflow models for remote visit types. Methods A 25-item survey was distributed to 481 American College of Cardiology CardioSurve panelists from 14 April 2023 through 11 May 2023. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate provider demographics and reported percentages of responses to opinions and statements in the questionnaire. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to determine statistically significant associations between categorical variables. Kruskal–Wallis H tests were performed on telemedicine visit frequency offered before, during, and after the pandemic. Results Seventy percent of respondents continue to offer telemedicine visits post-pandemic. Early career cardiologists were more likely to offer telemedicine visits compared to later career colleagues ( p = 0.004). The odds ratio for offering telemedicine visits for early career compared to late-career was 5.56 (95% CI [1.910, 16.277]) and 1.394 (95% CI [0.594, 3.269]) for mid-career compared to late-career. Sixty-three percent of respondents reported that lack of reliable internet access posed challenges for outpatient visits, and approximately one-third believed that the risk for malpractice increased when providing care remotely. Only 22% of cardiologists reported the use of telepresenters. Three clinical workflow models were then constructed to address potential barriers to telehealth implementation. Conclusions Cardiologists continue to offer telehealth visits, but concerns persist regarding the feasibility and appropriateness for a variety of ambulatory encounter types. To address these concerns, we have proposed several models for telehealth integration into various outpatient settings to optimize access to care and lighten the burden placed on an already diminishing cardiology workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Health
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251364928
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic

Claire S. Duvernoy, S. Elissa Altin, J. Miao, Paul Theriot et al.
Digital Health
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices and limitations during and following the COVID-19 pandemic

Claire S. Duvernoy, S. Elissa Altin, J. Miao, Paul Theriot, Anne Rzeszut, Paul D. Varosy
article en

Abstract

Background While telehealth utilization has decreased following the COVID-19 pandemic, the incorporation of remote visits into ambulatory cardiology practice guidelines remains a necessity. The aim of this study was to survey cardiologists’ perceptions on telehealth practices post-pandemic, and to propose clinical workflow models for remote visit types. Methods A 25-item survey was distributed to 481 American College of Cardiology CardioSurve panelists from 14 April 2023 through 11 May 2023. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate provider demographics and reported percentages of responses to opinions and statements in the questionnaire. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to determine statistically significant associations between categorical variables. Kruskal–Wallis H tests were performed on telemedicine visit frequency offered before, during, and after the pandemic. Results Seventy percent of respondents continue to offer telemedicine visits post-pandemic. Early career cardiologists were more likely to offer telemedicine visits compared to later career colleagues ( p = 0.004). The odds ratio for offering telemedicine visits for early career compared to late-career was 5.56 (95% CI [1.910, 16.277]) and 1.394 (95% CI [0.594, 3.269]) for mid-career compared to late-career. Sixty-three percent of respondents reported that lack of reliable internet access posed challenges for outpatient visits, and approximately one-third believed that the risk for malpractice increased when providing care remotely. Only 22% of cardiologists reported the use of telepresenters. Three clinical workflow models were then constructed to address potential barriers to telehealth implementation. Conclusions Cardiologists continue to offer telehealth visits, but concerns persist regarding the feasibility and appropriateness for a variety of ambulatory encounter types. To address these concerns, we have proposed several models for telehealth integration into various outpatient settings to optimize access to care and lighten the burden placed on an already diminishing cardiology workforce.

Digital HealthVol. 11
American College of Cardiology (US), University of Michigan (US), Yale University (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), VA Connecticut Research and Education Foundation (US), Michigan Medicine (US), Rocky Mountain MS Center (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.