The Policy Preferences of Marginal Voters: Complicating Political Polarization in Education Policy

Across the nation, political candidates increasingly have engaged publicly with contemporary education issues, in part seeking to attract new voters. Meanwhile, political polarization has grown, including in public opinion regarding controversial education policy topics. In this context, we examine the education policy preferences of marginal voters, those who altered their voting behaviors between the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, by applying data representative of U.S. adults and granular data from Missouri’s voters, an increasingly conservative state with an active education policy agenda. Across a wide policy landscape, marginal voter stances stood out consistently only with respect to their opposition of policies limiting curricula related to race and ethnicity. We find little evidence indicating marginal voters vary from stable voters on additional hot-button issues including Critical Race Theory, school choice expansion, and transgender athlete participation. This evidence contributes to growing debate concerning the role of political polarization in contemporary education policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Politics Research
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x251367381
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Policy Preferences of Marginal Voters: Complicating Political Polarization in Education Policy

Anita Manion, J. Cameron Anglum
American Politics Research
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

The Policy Preferences of Marginal Voters: Complicating Political Polarization in Education Policy

Anita Manion, J. Cameron Anglum
article en

Abstract

Across the nation, political candidates increasingly have engaged publicly with contemporary education issues, in part seeking to attract new voters. Meanwhile, political polarization has grown, including in public opinion regarding controversial education policy topics. In this context, we examine the education policy preferences of marginal voters, those who altered their voting behaviors between the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, by applying data representative of U.S. adults and granular data from Missouri’s voters, an increasingly conservative state with an active education policy agenda. Across a wide policy landscape, marginal voter stances stood out consistently only with respect to their opposition of policies limiting curricula related to race and ethnicity. We find little evidence indicating marginal voters vary from stable voters on additional hot-button issues including Critical Race Theory, school choice expansion, and transgender athlete participation. This evidence contributes to growing debate concerning the role of political polarization in contemporary education policy.

American Politics ResearchVol. 54(1)
Lehigh University (US), University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.